Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] misc: add documentation for FDBox

[Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>]

Pratyush Yadav <ptyadav@amazon.de> writes:

> On Fri, Mar 07 2025, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>
>> Pratyush Yadav <ptyadav@amazon.de> writes:
>>
>>> With FDBox in place, add documentation that describes what it is and how
>>> it is used, along with its UAPI and in-kernel API.
>>>
>>> Since the document refers to KHO, add a reference tag in kho/index.rst.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <ptyadav@amazon.de>
>>> ---
>>>  Documentation/filesystems/locking.rst |  21 +++
>>>  Documentation/kho/fdbox.rst           | 224 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  Documentation/kho/index.rst           |   3 +
>>>  MAINTAINERS                           |   1 +
>>>  4 files changed, 249 insertions(+)
>>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/kho/fdbox.rst
>>
>> Please do not create a new top-level directory under Documentation for
>> this; your new file belongs in userspace-api/.
>
> I did not. The top-level directory comes from the KHO patches [0] (not
> merged yet). This series is based on top of those. You can find the full
> tree here [1].
>
> Since this is closely tied to KHO I found it a good fit for putting it
> on KHO's directory. I don't have strong opinions about this so don't
> mind moving it elsewhere if you think that is better.

I've not seen the KHO stuff, but I suspect I'll grumble about that too.
Our documentation should be organized for its audience, not for its
authors.  So yes, I think that your documentation of the user-space
interface should definitely go in the userspace-api book.

Thanks,

jon

(Who now realizes he has been arguing this point of view for over ten
years ... eventually it will get across... :)