From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1B2710A16 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 02:11:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714011102; cv=none; b=bXi6O4N1d0FKYiACkZTQrtlO6FYhLJcbsQZNtW7NuDxLkIXYB9f4FrUBgYl7nHcKttbmejg6rQnchvj461MFMVO6wnkLCp3Dt71MFp1ilbbbNuKDD5XKOaAaVQ7Fg/2nUAeSieEKOoYm1L+UmH8cPMFr01XN1TYwQ09tPm9bbM4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714011102; c=relaxed/simple; bh=DJcpG+MqSFibXno8VdaF/4H+Z9GVE458K9cYb1s5RL8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=J7MnJSpK8qv4aFTc16/uKmz+3OAqwLx7HHX+zqBqAA+mw0z0rv92v86eUXuKn8tpauzVLnSxDIkcxZh1JKqNOirXyF6wIYgGbef8wZqHOxEIMRyDTzVxfJ/V2ar8GSIJ4tXcLsefm/u01OXGNdvfBml55hjISFlcvFHnCqvfKnU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=4imO72Q0; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=QlaXmZe5; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="4imO72Q0"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="QlaXmZe5" From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1714011098; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=BioXVpNosp+NvluXb69ryhG29p5YhlH51Sb1KybnhX4=; b=4imO72Q0kojZF7nKlnjSk/1mG1g9/4X5OSx8zq7gcqtrilIWg3UVxyz1d/06N4Swi4J8rB +17mSHTdeiRCCvZnuPABsFzL6FDePOjABJVGO90iqwCK4MLI1U/nKcuQ91CVRPzYhhxHOk a0i2y5qoTCWblA9Gj+SdHnMROafQy0VneKtNx/FoTpNP6wsmsu3aoKJdEl1dcWYqBSuaWL mwe329VBv3jfhXRLUst2XfUo8p0QKqTQheJnqdlc2hLLELS/SvDd0Ppiz2LXQnqj9rKOYG DsI2mK8Ev4pkrYlurPcFammZZgENPenUb3X1TJCl4/8XpkzBbIM+cCY8MXkFcQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1714011098; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=BioXVpNosp+NvluXb69ryhG29p5YhlH51Sb1KybnhX4=; b=QlaXmZe5QPZryZ62kj6TLUmqYUKeokqJdAXUf2m5bQmnBV9xOz+o5idvQXIVM8DyUr+Cfb Hx9nmH0OwYqyamDw== To: Lyude Paul , Borislav Petkov Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Early boot regression from f0551af0213 ("x86/topology: Ignore non-present APIC IDs in a present package") In-Reply-To: <3a0afe545747e5314a9cb6bbaa9ce90b259ddfac.camel@redhat.com> References: <3d77cb89857ee43a9c31249f4eab7196013bc4b4.camel@redhat.com> <20240418082703.GCZiDZVyra7qOQbyqn@fat_crate.local> <87plumxz4x.ffs@tglx> <87le59vw1y.ffs@tglx> <3a0afe545747e5314a9cb6bbaa9ce90b259ddfac.camel@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 04:11:16 +0200 Message-ID: <87edautcmz.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Lyude! On Wed, Apr 24 2024 at 16:56, Lyude Paul wrote: > On Sat, 2024-04-20 at 00:15 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Lyude is fine BTW :P (I get the confusion though, Paul is usually not a > last name lol) :) > Anyway - unfortunately it doesn't seem like this patch helps :s, I'm > still not seeing any difference and the backtrace I'm seeing at early > boot looks the same. Any more information I can provide? Can you please boot a kernel with the commit in question reverted and add 'possible_cpus=8' to the kernel command line? In theory this should fail too. Thanks, tglx