From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org,
patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org,
pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de,
conor@kernel.org, allen.lkml@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org,
maco@android.com, christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr,
sean.anderson@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 000/175] 4.19.312-rc1 review
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:02:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87edbaz6vs.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZhmPpo+EI9Ce3bI1@duo.ucw.cz>
On Fri, Apr 12 2024 at 21:46, Pavel Machek wrote:
>> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>> timers: Move clearing of base::timer_running under base:: Lock
>
> AFAICT, we don't have those NULL assignments in expire_timers in
> 4.19. Can someone doublecheck this? We also don't support PREEMPT_RT
> there.
This has nothing to do with RT.
But yes, 4.19 has the original bass::running_timer clearing which
happens at the end of handling all expired timer callbacks and that
actually happens with base->lock held.
So right, 4.19 is not affected by this.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-12 20:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-11 9:53 [PATCH 4.19 000/175] 4.19.312-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-04-11 12:02 ` Pavel Machek
2024-04-11 14:20 ` Naresh Kamboju
2024-04-12 8:29 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-04-11 23:56 ` Shuah Khan
2024-04-12 8:03 ` Jon Hunter
2024-04-12 10:11 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
2024-04-12 19:46 ` Pavel Machek
2024-04-12 20:02 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2024-04-13 5:43 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-04-12 20:10 ` Sean Anderson
2024-04-12 20:18 ` Sean Anderson
2024-04-12 20:15 ` *** SPAM *** " Marion & Christophe JAILLET
2024-04-13 5:39 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-04-30 6:30 ` Genjian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87edbaz6vs.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=allen.lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=maco@android.com \
--cc=patches@kernelci.org \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pavel@denx.de \
--cc=rwarsow@gmx.de \
--cc=sean.anderson@linux.dev \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=srw@sladewatkins.net \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox