From: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>, Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
Luo Yuzhang <yuzhang.luo@intel.com>,
Tony Zhu <tony.zhu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] iommu/vt-d: Fix incorrect cache invalidation for mm notification
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2023 10:57:43 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87edgll1up.fsf@nvdebian.thelocal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231117090933.75267-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> writes:
> Commit 6bbd42e2df8f ("mmu_notifiers: call invalidate_range() when
> invalidating TLBs") moved the secondary TLB invalidations into the TLB
> invalidation functions to ensure that all secondary TLB invalidations
> happen at the same time as the CPU invalidation and added a flush-all
> type of secondary TLB invalidation for the batched mode, where a range
> of [0, -1UL) is used to indicates that the range extends to the end of
> the address space.
>
> However, using an end address of -1UL caused an overflow in the Intel
> IOMMU driver, where the end address was rounded up to the next page.
> As a result, both the IOTLB and device ATC were not invalidated correctly.
Thanks for catching. This fix looks good so:
Reviewed-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
However examining the fixes patch again I note that we are calling
mmu_notifier_invalidate_range(mm, 0, -1UL) from
arch_tlbbatch_add_pending() in arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h.
That seems suboptimal because we would be doing an invalidate all for
every page unmap, and as of db6c1f6f236d ("mm/tlbbatch: introduce
arch_flush_tlb_batched_pending()") arch_flush_tlb_batched_pending()
calls flush_tlb_mm() anyway. So I think we can probably drop the
explicit notifier call from arch_flush_tlb_batched_pending().
Will put togeather a patch for that.
- Alistair
> Add a flush all helper function and call it when the invalidation range
> is from 0 to -1UL, ensuring that the entire caches are invalidated
> correctly.
>
> Fixes: 6bbd42e2df8f ("mmu_notifiers: call invalidate_range() when invalidating TLBs")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
> Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
> Tested-by: Luo Yuzhang <yuzhang.luo@intel.com> # QAT
> Tested-by: Tony Zhu <tony.zhu@intel.com> # DSA
> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
> index 50a481c895b8..588385050a07 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
> @@ -216,6 +216,27 @@ static void intel_flush_svm_range(struct intel_svm *svm, unsigned long address,
> rcu_read_unlock();
> }
>
> +static void intel_flush_svm_all(struct intel_svm *svm)
> +{
> + struct device_domain_info *info;
> + struct intel_svm_dev *sdev;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + list_for_each_entry_rcu(sdev, &svm->devs, list) {
> + info = dev_iommu_priv_get(sdev->dev);
> +
> + qi_flush_piotlb(sdev->iommu, sdev->did, svm->pasid, 0, -1UL, 1);
> + if (info->ats_enabled) {
> + qi_flush_dev_iotlb_pasid(sdev->iommu, sdev->sid, info->pfsid,
> + svm->pasid, sdev->qdep,
> + 0, 64 - VTD_PAGE_SHIFT);
> + quirk_extra_dev_tlb_flush(info, 0, 64 - VTD_PAGE_SHIFT,
> + svm->pasid, sdev->qdep);
> + }
> + }
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> +}
> +
> /* Pages have been freed at this point */
> static void intel_arch_invalidate_secondary_tlbs(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
> struct mm_struct *mm,
> @@ -223,6 +244,11 @@ static void intel_arch_invalidate_secondary_tlbs(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
> {
> struct intel_svm *svm = container_of(mn, struct intel_svm, notifier);
>
> + if (start == 0 && end == -1UL) {
> + intel_flush_svm_all(svm);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> intel_flush_svm_range(svm, start,
> (end - start + PAGE_SIZE - 1) >> VTD_PAGE_SHIFT, 0);
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-20 0:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-17 9:09 [PATCH 1/1] iommu/vt-d: Fix incorrect cache invalidation for mm notification Lu Baolu
2023-11-17 13:11 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-19 23:57 ` Alistair Popple [this message]
2023-11-20 2:55 ` Huang, Ying
2023-11-22 6:14 ` Alistair Popple
2023-11-20 3:45 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-11-20 4:17 ` Baolu Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87edgll1up.fsf@nvdebian.thelocal \
--to=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony.zhu@intel.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=yuzhang.luo@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox