From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: suijingfeng <suijingfeng@loongson.cn>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>, Li Yi <liyi@loongson.cn>
Cc: loongson-kernel@lists.loongnix.cn, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/loongson: Fix two warnings because of passing wrong type
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 11:03:11 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87edlej2o0.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <afbbda82-0635-bef3-b9ff-d5c6575631b8@loongson.cn>
On Mon, 10 Jul 2023, suijingfeng <suijingfeng@loongson.cn> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2023/7/10 18:26, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Mon, 10 Jul 2023, Sui Jingfeng <suijingfeng@loongson.cn> wrote:
>>> When accessing I/O memory, we should pass '__iomem *' type instead of
>>> 'void *' simply, otherwise sparse tests will complain. After applied
>>> this patch, the following two sparse warnings got fixed.
>> Usually the commit message should explain why it's okay to cast away the
>> warning.
>>
>> Because realistically this doesn't "fix" the warning, this merely hides
>> it.
>
>
> My understanding is that a point itself is just a variable where store a
> address,
>
> if this address originally point to I/O memory,
>
> then, we can other cast it to u64 type, then cast it back to '__iomem *'
> again.
>
> as long as the type's bit-width is width enough to store this address,
> we won't lost the information.
>
>
> 'void *' or 'u64' is just a intermediate represent of the address.
>
> we can other cast it to u64 type, then cast it back to 'void __iomem *'
> or 'void *' again.
>
>
> Why it's okay ? My answer is that
>
> As long as a address is really point to the I/O memory, cast it to 'void
> __iomem *' is OK.
>
> As long as a address is really point to the system memory, cast it to
> 'void *' is OK.
The point of __iomem is to have sparse help you in tracking that, so you
don't accidentally mix up the two.
BR,
Jani.
>
>
>> BR,
>> Jani.
>>
>>> 1) drivers/gpu/drm/loongson/lsdc_benchmark.c:27:35:
>>> sparse: expected void volatile [noderef] __iomem *
>>> sparse: got void *kptr
>>>
>>> 2) drivers/gpu/drm/loongson/lsdc_benchmark.c:42:51:
>>> sparse: expected void const volatile [noderef] __iomem *
>>> sparse: got void *kptr
>>>
>>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307100243.v3hv6aes-lkp@intel.com/
>>> Signed-off-by: Sui Jingfeng <suijingfeng@loongson.cn>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/loongson/lsdc_benchmark.c | 4 ++--
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/loongson/lsdc_benchmark.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/loongson/lsdc_benchmark.c
>>> index b088646a2ff9..36e352820bdb 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/loongson/lsdc_benchmark.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/loongson/lsdc_benchmark.c
>>> @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ static void lsdc_copy_gtt_to_vram_cpu(struct lsdc_bo *src_bo,
>>> lsdc_bo_kmap(dst_bo);
>>>
>>> while (n--)
>>> - memcpy_toio(dst_bo->kptr, src_bo->kptr, size);
>>> + memcpy_toio((void __iomem *)dst_bo->kptr, src_bo->kptr, size);
>>>
>>> lsdc_bo_kunmap(src_bo);
>>> lsdc_bo_kunmap(dst_bo);
>>> @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ static void lsdc_copy_vram_to_gtt_cpu(struct lsdc_bo *src_bo,
>>> lsdc_bo_kmap(dst_bo);
>>>
>>> while (n--)
>>> - memcpy_fromio(dst_bo->kptr, src_bo->kptr, size);
>>> + memcpy_fromio(dst_bo->kptr, (void __iomem *)src_bo->kptr, size);
>>>
>>> lsdc_bo_kunmap(src_bo);
>>> lsdc_bo_kunmap(dst_bo);
>
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-11 8:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-10 10:09 [PATCH] drm/loongson: Fix two warnings because of passing wrong type Sui Jingfeng
2023-07-10 10:26 ` Jani Nikula
2023-07-10 13:10 ` suijingfeng
2023-07-11 8:03 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2023-07-10 13:50 ` suijingfeng
2023-07-10 10:36 ` Thomas Zimmermann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87edlej2o0.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liyi@loongson.cn \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=loongson-kernel@lists.loongnix.cn \
--cc=suijingfeng@loongson.cn \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox