From: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>,
'Petr Mladek' <pmladek@suse.com>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: 5.19 printk breaks message ordering
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2022 10:21:37 +0206 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87edzlrrva.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a35dc47eb9924d56bb6dca7868c34c94@AcuMS.aculab.com>
On 2022-06-17, David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM> wrote:
> What priority do these kthreads run at?
120 (SCHED_OTHER, nice=0)
> I'd have thought they ought to run at a high priority?
> That should tend to give kernel messages priority over user ones.
>
> Quite how high is another matter.
> Probably a bit below the RT/FIFO:50 of threaded ISR.
As a default value, I recommend keeping to the SCHED_OTHER policy as a
default. Perhaps a nice value of -20? There are quite a few kernel
threads using that as their default:
# ps -Leo ni,command | grep ^-20 | sort
-20 [acpi_thermal_pm]
-20 [ata_sff]
-20 [blkcg_punt_bio]
-20 [cfg80211]
-20 [inet_frag_wq]
-20 [ipv6_addrconf]
-20 [kblockd]
-20 [kworker/0:0H-events_highpri]
-20 [kworker/0:1H-events_highpri]
-20 [md]
-20 [mld]
-20 [mm_percpu_wq]
-20 [netns]
-20 [nfsiod]
-20 [rcu_gp]
-20 [rcu_par_gp]
-20 [rpciod]
-20 [scsi_tmf_0]
-20 [scsi_tmf_1]
-20 [writeback]
-20 [xprtiod]
John Ogness
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-19 8:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-17 13:23 5.19 printk breaks message ordering Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-06-17 13:37 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-06-17 13:38 ` [PATCH] printk: allow direct console printing to be enabled always Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-06-19 0:30 ` Randy Dunlap
2022-06-19 8:37 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-06-19 11:05 ` John Ogness
2022-06-19 20:39 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-06-19 20:43 ` [PATCH v2] " Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-06-19 23:17 ` John Ogness
2022-06-19 23:28 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-06-19 23:33 ` [PATCH v3] " Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-06-20 16:58 ` Petr Mladek
2022-06-20 17:03 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-06-21 9:43 ` David Laight
2022-06-21 9:59 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-06-22 12:55 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-06-20 4:04 ` [PATCH v2] " David Laight
2022-06-20 5:17 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2022-06-20 7:56 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-06-21 1:34 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2022-06-21 21:47 ` John Ogness
2022-06-17 14:21 ` 5.19 printk breaks message ordering Petr Mladek
2022-06-17 14:41 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-06-17 15:01 ` David Laight
2022-06-19 8:15 ` John Ogness [this message]
2022-06-19 14:24 ` David Laight
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87edzlrrva.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de \
--to=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox