public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: kernel report robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	lkp@lists.01.org, lkp@intel.com, ying.huang@intel.com,
	feng.tang@intel.com, zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PCI/MSI]  77e89afc25:  will-it-scale.per_process_ops -2.6% regression
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 00:32:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87eeaf3khx.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210818145122.GC1721@xsang-OptiPlex-9020>

On Wed, Aug 18 2021 at 22:51, kernel report robot wrote:

> Greeting,
>
> FYI, we noticed a -2.6% regression of will-it-scale.per_process_ops due to commit:
>
>
> commit: 77e89afc25f30abd56e76a809ee2884d7c1b63ce ("PCI/MSI: Protect msi_desc::masked for multi-MSI")
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
>
>
> in testcase: will-it-scale
> on test machine: 128 threads 2 sockets Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6338 CPU @ 2.00GHz with 256G memory
> with following parameters:
>
> 	nr_task: 100%
> 	mode: process
> 	test: lseek2
> 	cpufreq_governor: performance
> 	ucode: 0xd000280
>
> test-description: Will It Scale takes a testcase and runs it from 1 through to n parallel copies to see if the testcase will scale. It builds both a process and threads based test in order to see any differences between the two.
> test-url: https://github.com/antonblanchard/will-it-scale
>
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>

There is nothing to fix. The commit cures an incorrectness. Comparing
buggy code to correct code is futile.

Thanks,

        tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-26 22:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-18 14:51 [PCI/MSI] 77e89afc25: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -2.6% regression kernel report robot
2021-08-26 22:32 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2021-09-01  3:07   ` Oliver Sang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87eeaf3khx.ffs@tglx \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox