From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F44CC4727E for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 00:19:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF6F820882 for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 00:19:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="P7S+u4NB"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="YZz4NNIQ" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1733197AbgJBATa (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Oct 2020 20:19:30 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36338 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727017AbgJBATa (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Oct 2020 20:19:30 -0400 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89A73C0613D0; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 17:19:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1601597967; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=3HcQLfTCdyVO5Aew4yZ9f7hx5197SRtmMDoZKfBBuag=; b=P7S+u4NBLNxK0fVe6ikV9RwnrGxIZNyvl8yuRWFknJ9pl7nY3YdYpDw8RupCMKhmX2tinY qUmf0CjsSB3PYraHEKhB0xgRCcla4nrWfkIhqfZqJ9KCGN3GIJiDd9Y/vY18UjqLWeGV2d 2GkZu+snoJKYWZSIPWoHNjvAazB2xD8V6UrrcjLUG0Lh6kJMqjeNWMvPgrMWPRYLM39wmN 0q55J/LAkrRhT3Tz5GrFjCPNHUuhyKkhC+SeZwMDytrvd8yiX2ec39vJvTM0rlxZm1J81c 4v37xtDcHmj+8OSlk5ydqM1d0noQlDoO0YK3S7Min/6rt6d5g08l42i4mgqPFg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1601597967; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=3HcQLfTCdyVO5Aew4yZ9f7hx5197SRtmMDoZKfBBuag=; b=YZz4NNIQGs9a4E3S5CeuvBnWUjebGNV7dXHwX6D7KdGacq8C2JMaZyryopYalh7J1h5VU/ Mv3JDvWQJIjm8JDQ== To: Erez Geva , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Cong Wang , "David S . Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Jamal Hadi Salim , Jiri Pirko , Andrei Vagin , Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>, "Eric W . Biederman" , Ingo Molnar , John Stultz , Michal Kubecek , Oleg Nesterov , Peter Zijlstra , Richard Cochran , Stephen Boyd , Vladis Dronov , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Frederic Weisbecker , Eric Dumazet Cc: Jesus Sanchez-Palencia , Vinicius Costa Gomes , Vedang Patel , Simon Sudler , Andreas Meisinger , Andreas Bucher , Henning Schild , Jan Kiszka , Andreas Zirkler , Ermin Sakic , An Ninh Nguyen , Michael Saenger , Bernd Maehringer , Gisela Greinert , Erez Geva , Erez Geva Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] Function to retrieve main clock state In-Reply-To: <87wo09eh4u.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> References: <20201001205141.8885-1-erez.geva.ext@siemens.com> <20201001205141.8885-3-erez.geva.ext@siemens.com> <87wo09eh4u.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2020 02:19:27 +0200 Message-ID: <87eemheay8.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 02 2020 at 00:05, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Thu, Oct 01 2020 at 22:51, Erez Geva wrote: > > same comments as for patch 1 apply. > >> Add kernel function to retrieve main clock oscillator state. > > The function you are adding is named adjtimex(). adjtimex(2) is a well > known user space interface and naming a read only kernel interface the > same way is misleading. Aside of that there is no user for this function in this series. We're not adding interfaces just because we can. Thanks, tglx