From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC757C67839 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 09:49:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71B8020866 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 09:49:34 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 71B8020866 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=mail.parknet.co.jp Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728955AbeLNJtd (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Dec 2018 04:49:33 -0500 Received: from mail.parknet.co.jp ([210.171.160.6]:42600 "EHLO mail.parknet.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727579AbeLNJtc (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Dec 2018 04:49:32 -0500 Received: from ibmpc.myhome.or.jp (server.parknet.ne.jp [210.171.168.39]) by mail.parknet.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ABE2B161688; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 18:49:31 +0900 (JST) Received: from devron.myhome.or.jp (foobar@devron.myhome.or.jp [192.168.0.3]) by ibmpc.myhome.or.jp (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-12) with ESMTPS id wBE9nUF3025703 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 14 Dec 2018 18:49:31 +0900 Received: from devron.myhome.or.jp (foobar@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by devron.myhome.or.jp (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-12) with ESMTPS id wBE9nU3i027752 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 14 Dec 2018 18:49:30 +0900 Received: (from hirofumi@localhost) by devron.myhome.or.jp (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id wBE9nSLM027751; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 18:49:28 +0900 From: OGAWA Hirofumi To: Tamir Carmeli Cc: joe@perches.com, jthumshirn@suse.de, Sergey Senozhatsky , akpm@linux-foundation.org, axboe@kernel.dk, martin.petersen@oracle.com, bvanassche@acm.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fat: New macros to determine the FAT variant (32, 16 or 12) References: <1544470917-6443-1-git-send-email-carmeli.tamir@gmail.com> <1544470917-6443-3-git-send-email-carmeli.tamir@gmail.com> <906167f7ca975d437ff9868333d8bf1e86b934a7.camel@perches.com> <87sgz0dci0.fsf@mail.parknet.co.jp> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 18:49:28 +0900 In-Reply-To: (Tamir Carmeli's message of "Fri, 14 Dec 2018 10:14:35 +0200") Message-ID: <87efakcuaf.fsf@mail.parknet.co.jp> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Tamir Carmeli writes: > I just want to make sure, is there a reason why I shouldn't delete > FAT_FIRST_ENT, as Joe Perches commented? FAT_FIRST_ENT() was used to check if fat spec compliance. But in real world, there are too many implementations that didn't follow spec. Well, so, now FAT_FIRST_ENT() is pointed only from comment. The reason is only for this comment. Thanks. -- OGAWA Hirofumi