From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751382AbdHDGge (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Aug 2017 02:36:34 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:50478 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751261AbdHDGgc (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Aug 2017 02:36:32 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 4FECD605A8 Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=kvalo@codeaurora.org From: Kalle Valo To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Wireless , Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Johannes Berg , Luca Coelho Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-drivers-next tree with Linus' tree References: <20170804120408.0d147e86@canb.auug.org.au> Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2017 09:36:26 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20170804120408.0d147e86@canb.auug.org.au> (Stephen Rothwell's message of "Fri, 4 Aug 2017 12:04:08 +1000") Message-ID: <87efsrn8k5.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Stephen Rothwell writes: > Today's linux-next merge of the wireless-drivers-next tree got a > conflict in: > > drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/ops.c > > between commit: > > bf8b286f86fc ("iwlwifi: mvm: defer setting IWL_MVM_STATUS_IN_HW_RESTART") > > from Linus' tree and commit: > > 7174beb60c53 ("iwlwifi: refactor firmware debug code") > > from the wireless-drivers-next tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly > complex conflicts. Thanks, the resolution looks good. I'll notify Dave about this when I send the wireless-drivers-next pull request to him. -- Kalle Valo