From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750905AbdAXUzW (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jan 2017 15:55:22 -0500 Received: from mail.free-electrons.com ([62.4.15.54]:42489 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750715AbdAXUzT (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jan 2017 15:55:19 -0500 From: Gregory CLEMENT To: Andrew Lunn Cc: Vivien Didelot , Florian Fainelli , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Jason Cooper , Sebastian Hesselbarth , Thomas Petazzoni , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Nadav Haklai , Wilson Ding , Kostya Porotchkin , Joe Zhou , Jon Pannell Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 4/4] phy: marvell: Add support for the PHY embedded in the topaz switch References: <20170124202847.GV10895@lunn.ch> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 21:55:08 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20170124202847.GV10895@lunn.ch> (Andrew Lunn's message of "Tue, 24 Jan 2017 21:28:47 +0100") Message-ID: <87efzs2n6b.fsf@free-electrons.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Andrew, On mar., janv. 24 2017, Andrew Lunn wrote: > On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 09:10:26PM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: >> The PHY with the ID 0x1410C00 > > :-( > > I don't have a better reference, but > Linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/phy.txt says: > > 22 If the phy's identifier is known then the list may contain an entry > 23 of the form: "ethernet-phy-idAAAA.BBBB" where > 24 AAAA - The value of the 16 bit Phy Identifier 1 register as > 25 4 hex digits. This is the chip vendor OUI bits 3:18 > 26 BBBB - The value of the 16 bit Phy Identifier 2 register as > 27 4 hex digits. This is the chip vendor OUI bits 19:24, > 28 followed by 10 bits of a vendor specific ID. > > So the lower 10 bits of 0x1410C00 are 0. So we know it is a Marvell > PHY from the OUI, but the vendor specific bits are all 0. In your previous email you mention a value of 0x01410000, so when I saw the "C00" at the end I was happy and I didn't look for further. > > Please take a look at: > > https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=148495522620757&w=1 > > and > > https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=148495510320714&w=1 > > Maybe i should submit these two independently, so you can extend it > for the 88E6341 family. Please do it :) The feedback from Florian and Vivian was good about it so I see no reason to not apply them. Add me in CC so I will now when to rebase my series. Thanks, Gregory > > Andrew -- Gregory Clement, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com