From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, devel@linuxdriverproject.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kys@microsoft.com,
haiyangz@microsoft.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] netvsc: get rid of completion timeouts
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2016 10:53:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87eg86agkx.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160608.113220.1066436035256605334.davem@davemloft.net> (David Miller's message of "Wed, 08 Jun 2016 11:32:20 -0700 (PDT)")
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> writes:
> From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
> Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 19:17:41 +0200
>
>> I'm hitting 5 second timeout in rndis_filter_set_rss_param() while setting
>> RSS parameters for the device. When this happens we end up returning
>> -ETIMEDOUT from the function and rndis_filter_device_add() falls back to
>> setting
>>
>> net_device->max_chn = 1;
>> net_device->num_chn = 1;
>> net_device->num_sc_offered = 0;
>>
>> but after a moment the rndis request succeeds and subchannels start to
>> appear. netvsc_sc_open() does unconditional nvscdev->num_sc_offered-- and
>> it becomes U32_MAX-1. Consequent rndis_filter_device_remove() will hang
>> while waiting for all U32_MAX-1 subchannels to appear and this is not
>> going to happen.
>>
>> The immediate issue could be solved by adding num_sc_offered > 0 check to
>> netvsc_sc_open() but we're getting out of sync with the host and it's not
>> easy to adjust things later, e.g. in this particular case we'll be creating
>> queues without a user request for it and races are expected. Same applies
>> to other parts of the driver which have the same completion timeout.
>>
>> Following the trend in drivers/hv/* code I suggest we remove all these
>> timeouts completely. As a guest we can always trust the host we're running
>> on and if the host screws things up there is no easy way to recover anyway.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
>> Acked-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>
>
> This doesn't apply cleanly to net-next, I get rejects.
Sorry for the screw up, apparently I forgot about my own cleanups I sent
before. v3 is coming.
--
Vitaly
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-09 8:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-08 17:17 [PATCH net-next v2] netvsc: get rid of completion timeouts Vitaly Kuznetsov
2016-06-08 18:32 ` David Miller
2016-06-09 8:53 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87eg86agkx.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com \
--to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox