From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>, Li Yang <leoli@freescale.com>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb: gadget: fsl_udc_core: Fix pullup status
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 14:19:42 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87egatsf8x.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56FA6411.4070802@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2122 bytes --]
Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> writes:
> 29.03.2016 13:31, Felipe Balbi пишет:
>> Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> writes:
>>> udc->softconnect should be set regardless of the VBUS state, otherwise
>>> the USB peripheral device, connected during suspend, won't be detected
>>> since can_pullup() would return false and the UDC won't be enabled.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 252455c40316 (usb: gadget: fsl driver pullup fix)
>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>> Changelog:
>>> V2: "(is_on != 0)" changed to "!!is_on" as per Sergei Shtylyov comment,
>>> cleaned up commit message.
>>>
>>> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/fsl_udc_core.c | 3 ++-
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/fsl_udc_core.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/fsl_udc_core.c
>>> index aab5221..4309b4f 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/fsl_udc_core.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/fsl_udc_core.c
>>> @@ -1220,10 +1220,11 @@ static int fsl_pullup(struct usb_gadget *gadget, int is_on)
>>>
>>> udc = container_of(gadget, struct fsl_udc, gadget);
>>>
>>> + udc->softconnect = !!is_on;
>>> +
>>> if (!udc->vbus_active)
>>> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>>
>>> - udc->softconnect = (is_on != 0);
>>
>> if we're suspended and VBUS was cut off, why would we keep softconnect
>> set to true ? That would also cause a discrepancy between SW state and
>> HW state.
>>
>> I don't have this HW to test, but this patch seems wrong to me.
>>
>
> Yeah, you are right. I'm using a fork of this driver with some minor differences
> to make it work with other hardware and missed that upstream driver enables
> controller on resume unconditionally. Sorry for the noise and please ignore this
> patch.
you shouldn't send patches unless you have tested them. Simply
cherry-picking from another tree and sending it is NOT good enough. You
MUST test what you're sending with latest tag from Linus (right now,
that's v4.6-rc1). If you can't update your kernel, then don't try to
patch something you can't validate.
Thanks
--
balbi
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 818 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-29 11:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-25 15:11 [PATCH v2] usb: gadget: fsl_udc_core: Fix pullup status Dmitry Osipenko
2016-03-29 10:31 ` Felipe Balbi
2016-03-29 11:16 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2016-03-29 11:19 ` Felipe Balbi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87egatsf8x.fsf@intel.com \
--to=balbi@kernel.org \
--cc=digetx@gmail.com \
--cc=leoli@freescale.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox