From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753179Ab3KKJsQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Nov 2013 04:48:16 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:27975 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752796Ab3KKJr7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Nov 2013 04:47:59 -0500 References: <527C93B5.7010407@jp.fujitsu.com> <527C9B5C.6040509@nod.at> <527CB013.30200@jp.fujitsu.com> <527CB0F4.8080606@nod.at> <527CBC05.6080505@jp.fujitsu.com> <527CBD01.1000908@nod.at> <527CBDD3.2020609@jp.fujitsu.com> <20131108143421.GB22636@console-pimps.org> <52809AEB.9080100@jp.fujitsu.com> User-agent: mu4e 0.9.9.5; emacs 24.3.1 From: Madper Xie To: Yasuaki Ishimatsu Cc: Matt Fleming , Richard Weinberger , linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, matt.fleming@intel.com, matthew.garrett@nebula.com, jlee@suse.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, efi: change name of efi_no_storage_paranoia parameter to efi_storage_paranoia Message-ID: <87eh6ngthv.fsf@redhat.com> In-reply-to: <52809AEB.9080100@jp.fujitsu.com> Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 17:47:30 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Howdy Yasuaki, I know some boxes with small NVRAM (less than 64kb?) will meet many issues if we always keep ~5kb free space. But if we really do not keep some free space as default, many box will become a brick. (In fact, I just fixed a bricked dell xps 8500 last week. 5kb is not enough for dell xps...) So maybe the better way is: we check the size of nvram and decide how many space we retain. isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com writes: > Hi Matt, > > I uses FUJITSU's x86 box. > This does not become bricked even if I use all efi variable storage. > Thus I want a way to not need to specify efi_no_storage_paranoia > parameter. > > Thanks, > Yasuaki Ishimatsu > > > (2013/11/08 23:34), Matt Fleming wrote: >> On Fri, 08 Nov, at 07:32:51PM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote: >>>> Everything started with an issue that killed Samsung laptops: >>>> http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/22855.html >>>> >>>> Later it was found that if you write too much into UEFI variables many >>>> UEFI implementations will do bad things. >>> >>> Thanks for the information. >>> I will read it. >> >> Out of curiosity, what hardware are you using? >> > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Best, Madper Xie.