public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	joshhunt00@gmail.com, axboe@kernel.dk, rni@google.com,
	vgoyal@redhat.com, vwadekar@nvidia.com,
	herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au, davem@davemloft.net,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, swhiteho@redhat.com, bpm@sgi.com,
	elder@kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, marcel@holtmann.org,
	gustavo@padovan.org, johan.hedberg@gmail.com,
	linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, martin.petersen@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] workqueue: factor out worker_pool from global_cwq
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 13:48:44 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ehok8bmb.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1341859315-17759-3-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (Tejun Heo's message of "Mon, 9 Jul 2012 11:41:51 -0700")

Hi, Tejun

Just nitpicks..


On Mon,  9 Jul 2012 11:41:51 -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Move worklist and all worker management fields from global_cwq into
> the new struct worker_pool.  worker_pool points back to the containing
> gcwq.  worker and cpu_workqueue_struct are updated to point to
> worker_pool instead of gcwq too.
>
> This change is mechanical and doesn't introduce any functional
> difference other than rearranging of fields and an added level of
> indirection in some places.  This is to prepare for multiple pools per
> gcwq.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> ---
>  include/trace/events/workqueue.h |    2 +-
>  kernel/workqueue.c               |  216 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  2 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 100 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/trace/events/workqueue.h b/include/trace/events/workqueue.h
> index 4018f50..f28d1b6 100644
> --- a/include/trace/events/workqueue.h
> +++ b/include/trace/events/workqueue.h
> @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(workqueue_queue_work,
>  		__entry->function	= work->func;
>  		__entry->workqueue	= cwq->wq;
>  		__entry->req_cpu	= req_cpu;
> -		__entry->cpu		= cwq->gcwq->cpu;
> +		__entry->cpu		= cwq->pool->gcwq->cpu;
>  	),
>  
>  	TP_printk("work struct=%p function=%pf workqueue=%p req_cpu=%u cpu=%u",
> diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
> index 27637c2..bc43a0c 100644
> --- a/kernel/workqueue.c
> +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
> @@ -115,6 +115,7 @@ enum {
>   */
>  
>  struct global_cwq;
> +struct worker_pool;
>  
>  /*
>   * The poor guys doing the actual heavy lifting.  All on-duty workers
> @@ -131,7 +132,7 @@ struct worker {
>  	struct cpu_workqueue_struct *current_cwq; /* L: current_work's cwq */
>  	struct list_head	scheduled;	/* L: scheduled works */
>  	struct task_struct	*task;		/* I: worker task */
> -	struct global_cwq	*gcwq;		/* I: the associated gcwq */
> +	struct worker_pool	*pool;		/* I: the associated pool */
>  	/* 64 bytes boundary on 64bit, 32 on 32bit */
>  	unsigned long		last_active;	/* L: last active timestamp */
>  	unsigned int		flags;		/* X: flags */
> @@ -139,6 +140,21 @@ struct worker {
>  	struct work_struct	rebind_work;	/* L: rebind worker to cpu */
>  };
>  
> +struct worker_pool {
> +	struct global_cwq	*gcwq;		/* I: the owning gcwq */
> +
> +	struct list_head	worklist;	/* L: list of pending works */
> +	int			nr_workers;	/* L: total number of workers */
> +	int			nr_idle;	/* L: currently idle ones */
> +
> +	struct list_head	idle_list;	/* X: list of idle workers */
> +	struct timer_list	idle_timer;	/* L: worker idle timeout */
> +	struct timer_list	mayday_timer;	/* L: SOS timer for dworkers */

What is 'dworkers'?


> +
> +	struct ida		worker_ida;	/* L: for worker IDs */
> +	struct worker		*first_idle;	/* L: first idle worker */
> +};
> +
>  /*
>   * Global per-cpu workqueue.  There's one and only one for each cpu
>   * and all works are queued and processed here regardless of their
> @@ -146,27 +162,18 @@ struct worker {
>   */
>  struct global_cwq {
>  	spinlock_t		lock;		/* the gcwq lock */
> -	struct list_head	worklist;	/* L: list of pending works */
>  	unsigned int		cpu;		/* I: the associated cpu */
>  	unsigned int		flags;		/* L: GCWQ_* flags */
>  
> -	int			nr_workers;	/* L: total number of workers */
> -	int			nr_idle;	/* L: currently idle ones */
> -
> -	/* workers are chained either in the idle_list or busy_hash */
> -	struct list_head	idle_list;	/* X: list of idle workers */
> +	/* workers are chained either in busy_head or pool idle_list */

s/busy_head/busy_hash/ ?

Thanks,
Namhyung


>  	struct hlist_head	busy_hash[BUSY_WORKER_HASH_SIZE];
>  						/* L: hash of busy workers */
>  
> -	struct timer_list	idle_timer;	/* L: worker idle timeout */
> -	struct timer_list	mayday_timer;	/* L: SOS timer for dworkers */
> -
> -	struct ida		worker_ida;	/* L: for worker IDs */
> +	struct worker_pool	pool;		/* the worker pools */
>  
>  	struct task_struct	*trustee;	/* L: for gcwq shutdown */
>  	unsigned int		trustee_state;	/* L: trustee state */
>  	wait_queue_head_t	trustee_wait;	/* trustee wait */
> -	struct worker		*first_idle;	/* L: first idle worker */
>  } ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
>  
>  /*

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-10  4:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-09 18:41 [PATCHSET] workqueue: reimplement high priority using a separate worker pool Tejun Heo
2012-07-09 18:41 ` [PATCH 1/6] workqueue: don't use WQ_HIGHPRI for unbound workqueues Tejun Heo
2012-07-09 18:41 ` [PATCH 2/6] workqueue: factor out worker_pool from global_cwq Tejun Heo
2012-07-10  4:48   ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2012-07-12 17:07     ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-12 21:49   ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2012-07-09 18:41 ` [PATCH 3/6] workqueue: use @pool instead of @gcwq or @cpu where applicable Tejun Heo
2012-07-10 23:30   ` Tony Luck
2012-07-12 17:06     ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-09 18:41 ` [PATCH 4/6] workqueue: separate out worker_pool flags Tejun Heo
2012-07-09 18:41 ` [PATCH 5/6] workqueue: introduce NR_WORKER_POOLS and for_each_worker_pool() Tejun Heo
2012-07-14  3:55   ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-14  4:27     ` Linus Torvalds
2012-07-14  4:44       ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-14  5:00         ` Linus Torvalds
2012-07-14  5:07           ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-16 19:31           ` Peter Seebach
2012-07-14  5:21   ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2012-07-09 18:41 ` [PATCH 6/6] workqueue: reimplement WQ_HIGHPRI using a separate worker_pool Tejun Heo
2012-07-12 13:06   ` Fengguang Wu
2012-07-12 17:05     ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-12 21:45       ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-12 22:16         ` Tony Luck
2012-07-12 22:32           ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-12 23:24             ` Tony Luck
2012-07-12 23:36               ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-12 23:46                 ` Tony Luck
2012-07-13 17:51                   ` Tony Luck
2012-07-13  2:08         ` Fengguang Wu
2012-07-14  3:41           ` Tejun Heo
2012-07-14  3:56   ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2012-07-14  8:18     ` Fengguang Wu
2012-07-14  5:24   ` [PATCH UPDATED v3 " Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ehok8bmb.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com \
    --to=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bpm@sgi.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=elder@kernel.org \
    --cc=gustavo@padovan.org \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au \
    --cc=johan.hedberg@gmail.com \
    --cc=joshhunt00@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=rni@google.com \
    --cc=swhiteho@redhat.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=vwadekar@nvidia.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox