From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0ED0F349AEA; Fri, 13 Feb 2026 08:48:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770972518; cv=none; b=pUHE2e1ZoySW/kkEI5gqPrSw8Q3Z28TjIFUwOEunuka/mS9D2EMUbTYJMbBTBem+TNqHRB1yzCOgl3Oq0JnpTaqL55T1d+viWw3RD4XOEzBpHQQvKQDg1j45kowEgTM+bG7LyesBzcK/+Tnu0q5q4EslGwGZztQTx9p7Q8E+6c8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770972518; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MuqqbySfLbrXxCZtufrECjpaM62KymJsHeUZ+/3ILUk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=dV+Gai1C8pkSOPJMd7ob6sp7Cz/6E+Won1Z+iEU9rrvFLKTMH3kR9DHmconSEE6OLFPxSqo4OY7ATHVW72fF5OE8a6UYQuIs/FZ9DZRUhqpp8IBJpZiG+phtk+pz1hWp2gM6y37wxzO4QkIy6zbdx7O/VZsd8ZhZjYjg9GWE8W4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=NuAsqN72; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="NuAsqN72" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C19D4C116C6; Fri, 13 Feb 2026 08:48:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1770972517; bh=MuqqbySfLbrXxCZtufrECjpaM62KymJsHeUZ+/3ILUk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=NuAsqN72k5J1pxKAVhC3h9o8Wde0CkrZZEm6gJV3UZXlmszA6ptU5DSPzdLIZJhd4 hwMaHuOqq09YUfOu5WNNops3u49gYefv/Cj4xnEheg7hvzD0ZPAnHqZ/deTbRx2101 8KQsHIViEsW0D4VdfrG7sFpdixLHhanIJO/1id70bqJX9mCwBQKoiAhV0MCV6+94Rr cmTk4tKtIeSm4ZhaBOk5WWzJ8GeskISejgzuxBj32b7PVGYliJj62B2Xnrm8Zqg9tA RoZJJiiYNBgRU9nXMkaZXPmWWPTaChC4YvKztRSC1BXAkdINLc6Prb2GAJQgjpawqa /Bd+IrCkRH6GA== From: Thomas Gleixner To: kernel test robot , Yuwen Chen Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, ywen.chen@foxmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, andrealmeid@igalia.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de, colin.i.king@gmail.com, dave@stgolabs.net, dvhart@infradead.org, edliaw@google.com, justinstitt@google.com, kernel-team@android.com, licayy@foxmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, luto@mit.edu, mingo@redhat.com, morbo@google.com, nathan@kernel.org, nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com, peterz@infradead.org, shuah@kernel.org, usama.anjum@collabora.com, wakel@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/futex: fix incorrect result reporting of futex_wait test item In-Reply-To: <202602052333.1Bhrssu1-lkp@intel.com> References: <202602052333.1Bhrssu1-lkp@intel.com> Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2026 09:48:33 +0100 Message-ID: <87fr7581we.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Thu, Feb 05 2026 at 23:29, kernel test robot wrote: > compiler: clang version 22.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project f43d6834093b19baf79beda8c0337ab020ac5f17) >>> futex_wait.c:48:2: warning: format specifies type 'uintmax_t' (aka 'unsigned long') but the argument has type 'uintmax_t' (aka 'unsigned long long') [-Wformat] Priceless. Your compiler can't make it's mind up. uintmax_t is defined by the compiler provided includes. Thanks, tglx