public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
To: paulmck@kernel.org
Cc: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@kernel.org, bigeasy@linutronix.de,
	juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
	dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, vschneid@redhat.com,
	frederic@kernel.org, efault@gmx.de, sshegde@linux.ibm.com,
	boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] RCU changes for PREEMPT_LAZY
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2025 10:18:16 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87frltcgpj.fsf@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c38ebc69-33cc-4848-bcd6-a07404d8daa2@paulmck-laptop>


Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> writes:

> On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 08:06:51PM -0800, Ankur Arora wrote:
>> This series adds RCU bits for lazy preemption.
>>
>> The problem addressed is that pre-PREEMPT_LAZY, PREEMPTION=y implied
>> PREEMPT_RCU=y. With PREEMPT_LAZY, that's no longer true.
>>
>> That's because PREEMPT_RCU makes some trade-offs to optimize for
>> latency as opposed to throughput, and configurations with limited
>> preemption might prefer the stronger forward-progress guarantees of
>> PREEMPT_RCU=n.
>>
>> Accordingly, with standalone PREEMPT_LAZY (much like PREEMPT_NONE,
>> PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY) we want to use PREEMPT_RCU=n. And, when used in
>> conjunction with PREEMPT_DYNAMIC, we continue to use PREEMPT_RCU=y.
>>
>> Patches 1-3  are cleanup patches:
>>   "rcu: fix header guard for rcu_all_qs()"
>>   "rcu: rename PREEMPT_AUTO to PREEMPT_LAZY"
>>   "sched: update __cond_resched comment about RCU quiescent states"
>>
>> Patch 4,
>>   "rcu: handle unstable rdp in rcu_read_unlock_strict()"
>>
>> handles a latent RCU bug rcu_report_qs_rdp() could be called with
>> an unstable rdp.
>>
>> Patches 5 and 6,
>>   "rcu: handle quiescent states for PREEMPT_RCU=n, PREEMPT_COUNT=y"
>>   "osnoise: provide quiescent states"
>>
>> handle quiescent states for the (PREEMPT_LAZY=y, PREEMPT_RCU=n)
>> configuration.
>>
>> And, finally patch 7, "rcu: limit PREEMPT_RCU configurations",
>> explicitly limits PREEMPT_RCU=y to the PREEMPT_DYNAMIC or the latency
>> oriented models.
>
> Pulled into my -rcu tree for further review and testing, with initial
> tests passing.  Apologies for the delay!

Great. Thanks Paul!

Ankur

>> Changelog:
>>
>> v3:
>>  - moved patch-3 to be the last one in the series (suggested by Sebastian)
>>  - added "rcu: handle unstable rdp in rcu_read_unlock_strict()"
>>    (suggested by Frederic Weisbecker).
>>  - switched to a more robust check in rcu_flavor_sched_clock_irq()
>>    (suggested by Frederic Weisbecker).
>>  - simplified check in osnoise (suggested by Frederic Weisbecker).
>>  - dropped an unrelated scheduler patch.
>>
>> v2:
>>   - fixup incorrect usage of tif_need_resched_lazy() (comment from
>>     from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior)
>>   - massaged the commit messages a bit
>>   - drops the powerpc support for PREEMPT_LAZY as that was orthogonal
>>     to this series (Shrikanth will send that out separately.)
>>
>> Please review.
>>
>> Ankur Arora (7):
>>   rcu: fix header guard for rcu_all_qs()
>>   rcu: rename PREEMPT_AUTO to PREEMPT_LAZY
>>   sched: update __cond_resched comment about RCU quiescent states
>>   rcu: handle unstable rdp in rcu_read_unlock_strict()
>>   rcu: handle quiescent states for PREEMPT_RCU=n, PREEMPT_COUNT=y
>>   osnoise: provide quiescent states
>>   rcu: limit PREEMPT_RCU configurations
>>
>>  include/linux/rcupdate.h     |  2 +-
>>  include/linux/rcutree.h      |  2 +-
>>  include/linux/srcutiny.h     |  2 +-
>>  kernel/rcu/Kconfig           |  4 ++--
>>  kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c        | 14 +++++++-------
>>  kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h     | 22 +++++++++++++++++-----
>>  kernel/sched/core.c          |  4 +++-
>>  kernel/trace/trace_osnoise.c | 32 +++++++++++++++-----------------
>>  8 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 2.43.5
>>


--
ankur

      reply	other threads:[~2025-01-08 18:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-13  4:06 [PATCH v3 0/7] RCU changes for PREEMPT_LAZY Ankur Arora
2024-12-13  4:06 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] rcu: fix header guard for rcu_all_qs() Ankur Arora
2024-12-13  4:06 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] rcu: rename PREEMPT_AUTO to PREEMPT_LAZY Ankur Arora
2024-12-13  4:06 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] sched: update __cond_resched comment about RCU quiescent states Ankur Arora
2024-12-13 13:21   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-12-13  4:06 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] rcu: handle unstable rdp in rcu_read_unlock_strict() Ankur Arora
2024-12-13 13:38   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-12-13  4:06 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] rcu: handle quiescent states for PREEMPT_RCU=n, PREEMPT_COUNT=y Ankur Arora
2024-12-13 13:59   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-12-13 20:44     ` Ankur Arora
2024-12-13  4:06 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] osnoise: provide quiescent states Ankur Arora
2024-12-13 14:34   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-12-13  4:06 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] rcu: limit PREEMPT_RCU configurations Ankur Arora
2025-01-08  1:14 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] RCU changes for PREEMPT_LAZY Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-08 18:18   ` Ankur Arora [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87frltcgpj.fsf@oracle.com \
    --to=ankur.a.arora@oracle.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox