From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: Andrei Vagin <avagin@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] time/namespace: Forbid timens page faults under kthread_use_mm()
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 22:18:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fse1v4rf.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221129191839.2471308-2-jannh@google.com>
On Tue, Nov 29 2022 at 20:18, Jann Horn wrote:
> find_timens_vvar_page() doesn't work when current's timens does not match
> the timens associated with current->mm.
> v6 of the series adding this code [1] had some complicated code to deal
> with this case, but v7 [2] removed that.
>
> Since the vvar region is designed to only be accessed by vDSO code, and
> vDSO code can't run in kthread context, it should be fine to error out in
> this case.
Should? Either it is correct or not.
But the way more interesting question is:
> struct page *find_timens_vvar_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> {
> + /*
> + * We can't handle faults where current's timens does not match the
> + * timens associated with the mm_struct. This can happen if a page fault
> + * occurs in a kthread that is using kthread_use_mm().
> + */
How does a kthread, which obvioulsy did kthread_use_mm(), end up trying to
fault in the time namespace vvar page?
It's probably something nasty, but the changelog has a big information
void.
It neither answers the obvious question why this is a problem of the
time namespace vvar page and not a general issue versus a kthread, which
borrowed a user mm, ending up in vdso_fault() in the first place?
None of those VDSO (user space) addresses are subject to be faulted in
by anything else than the associated user space task(s).
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-29 21:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-29 19:18 [PATCH 1/2] time/namespace: Refactor copy-pasted helper into one copy Jann Horn
2022-11-29 19:18 ` [PATCH 2/2] time/namespace: Forbid timens page faults under kthread_use_mm() Jann Horn
2022-11-29 21:18 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2022-11-29 22:28 ` Jann Horn
2022-11-29 22:34 ` Jann Horn
2022-11-30 0:09 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-11-30 0:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-11-30 22:48 ` David Laight
2022-12-01 9:31 ` Jann Horn
2022-11-30 10:15 ` [PATCH 1/2] time/namespace: Refactor copy-pasted helper into one copy Jann Horn
2022-11-30 10:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87fse1v4rf.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=avagin@gmail.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox