From: "Luís Henriques" <lhenriques@suse.de>
To: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>,
ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ceph: invalidate pages when doing direct/sync writes
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2022 16:05:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fsmp7x3z.fsf@brahms.olymp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <253c9edf-01c5-40a3-3a11-738f29df8142@redhat.com> (Xiubo Li's message of "Thu, 7 Apr 2022 22:48:20 +0800")
Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com> writes:
> On 4/7/22 10:38 PM, Luís Henriques wrote:
>> When doing a direct/sync write, we need to invalidate the page cache in
>> the range being written to. If we don't do this, the cache will include
>> invalid data as we just did a write that avoided the page cache.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Luís Henriques <lhenriques@suse.de>
>> ---
>> fs/ceph/file.c | 9 +++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>
>> Ok, here's a new attempt. After discussion in this thread and on IRC, I
>> think this is the right fix. generic/647 now passes with and without
>> encryption. Thanks!
>>
>> Changes since v2:
>> - Invalidation needs to be done after a write
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>> - Replaced truncate_inode_pages_range() by invalidate_inode_pages2_range
>> - Call fscache_invalidate with FSCACHE_INVAL_DIO_WRITE if we're doing DIO
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ceph/file.c b/fs/ceph/file.c
>> index 5072570c2203..63e67eb60310 100644
>> --- a/fs/ceph/file.c
>> +++ b/fs/ceph/file.c
>> @@ -1938,6 +1938,15 @@ ceph_sync_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from, loff_t pos,
>> break;
>> }
>> ceph_clear_error_write(ci);
>> + ret = invalidate_inode_pages2_range(
>> + inode->i_mapping,
>> + pos >> PAGE_SHIFT,
>> + (pos + len - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + dout("invalidate_inode_pages2_range returned %d\n",
>> + ret);
>> + ret = 0;
>> + }
>> pos += len;
>> written += len;
>> dout("sync_write written %d\n", written);
>>
> LGTM.
>
> Maybe it worth adding a comment to explain why we need this and where the
> mapping come from ?
>
> Reviewed-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
>
Sure, I'll send out v4 with an extra comment. Thanks.
Cheers,
--
Luís
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-07 15:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-07 14:38 [PATCH v3] ceph: invalidate pages when doing direct/sync writes Luís Henriques
2022-04-07 14:42 ` Jeff Layton
2022-04-07 15:03 ` Luís Henriques
2022-04-07 14:48 ` Xiubo Li
2022-04-07 15:05 ` Luís Henriques [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87fsmp7x3z.fsf@brahms.olymp \
--to=lhenriques@suse.de \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiubli@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox