public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] genirq: Limit irq_calc_affinity_vectors to housekeeping CPUs
@ 2021-01-22  8:47 Liu Chao
  2021-01-28  0:06 ` Thomas Gleixner
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Liu Chao @ 2021-01-22  8:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: tglx, linux-kernel; +Cc: hushiyuan, hewenliang4

Replace the cpumask used in irq_calc_affinity_vectors from all possible
CPUs to only housekeeping CPUs.

When we have isolated CPUs used by real-time tasks, IRQs will be move to
housekeeping CPUs.

If there are too many IRQ vectors, moving the all to housekeeping CPUs may
exceed per-CPU vector limits. For example, when I only have two
housekeeping CPUs, there are dozens of IRQs on two CPUs, but actually one
IRQ per housekeeping CPU is enough.

Signed-off-by: Liu Chao <liuchao173@huawei.com>
---
 kernel/irq/affinity.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/irq/affinity.c b/kernel/irq/affinity.c
index 4d89ad4fae3b..3f22e3314e1b 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/affinity.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/affinity.c
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/cpu.h>
 #include <linux/sort.h>
+#include <linux/sched/isolation.h>
 
 static void irq_spread_init_one(struct cpumask *irqmsk, struct cpumask *nmsk,
 				unsigned int cpus_per_vec)
@@ -506,7 +507,8 @@ unsigned int irq_calc_affinity_vectors(unsigned int minvec, unsigned int maxvec,
 		set_vecs = maxvec - resv;
 	} else {
 		get_online_cpus();
-		set_vecs = cpumask_weight(cpu_possible_mask);
+		set_vecs = cpumask_weight(
+				housekeeping_cpumask(HK_FLAG_MANAGED_IRQ));
 		put_online_cpus();
 	}
 
-- 
2.23.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] genirq: Limit irq_calc_affinity_vectors to housekeeping CPUs
@ 2020-12-24  4:23 Liu Chao
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Liu Chao @ 2020-12-24  4:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: tglx, linux-kernel; +Cc: hushiyuan, hewenliang4

Replace the cpumask used in irq_calc_affinity_vectors from all possible
CPUs to only housekeeping CPUs.

When we have isolated CPUs used by real-time tasks, IRQs will be move to
housekeeping CPUs.

If there are too many IRQ vectors, moving the all to housekeeping CPUs may
exceed per-CPU vector limits. For example, when I only have two
housekeeping CPUs, there are dozens of IRQs on two CPUs, but actually one
IRQ per housekeeping CPU is enough.

Signed-off-by: Liu Chao <liuchao173@huawei.com>
---
 kernel/irq/affinity.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/irq/affinity.c b/kernel/irq/affinity.c
index 4d89ad4fae3b..3f22e3314e1b 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/affinity.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/affinity.c
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/cpu.h>
 #include <linux/sort.h>
+#include <linux/sched/isolation.h>
 
 static void irq_spread_init_one(struct cpumask *irqmsk, struct cpumask *nmsk,
 				unsigned int cpus_per_vec)
@@ -506,7 +507,8 @@ unsigned int irq_calc_affinity_vectors(unsigned int minvec, unsigned int maxvec,
 		set_vecs = maxvec - resv;
 	} else {
 		get_online_cpus();
-		set_vecs = cpumask_weight(cpu_possible_mask);
+		set_vecs = cpumask_weight(
+				housekeeping_cpumask(HK_FLAG_MANAGED_IRQ));
 		put_online_cpus();
 	}
 
-- 
2.23.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-01-28  0:07 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-01-22  8:47 [PATCH] genirq: Limit irq_calc_affinity_vectors to housekeeping CPUs Liu Chao
2021-01-28  0:06 ` Thomas Gleixner
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-12-24  4:23 Liu Chao

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox