public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/6] exec: Lock more defensively in exec
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 16:54:07 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ftalla80.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r1u5laac.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> (Eric W. Biederman's message of "Tue, 23 Jun 2020 16:52:43 -0500")


When taking the task_list_lock in de_thread also take the siglock.  This
makes de_thread closer to fork the canonical place where these locks are
taken.

To complete the defensiveness always take siglock when clearing
group_exit_task and notify_count.

This gives now gives the guarantee that group_exit_task and notify_count
are now always changed under siglock.  As anything multi-threaded in exec
is a rare and slow path I don't think we care if we take an extra lock in
practice.

The practical reason for doing this is to enable setting signal->flags along
with group_exit_task so that the function signal_group_exit can be simplified.

Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
---
 fs/exec.c | 11 +++++++++--
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index e6e8a9a70327..33b5d9229c01 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -1171,6 +1171,7 @@ static int de_thread(struct task_struct *tsk)
 		for (;;) {
 			cgroup_threadgroup_change_begin(tsk);
 			write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
+			spin_lock(lock);
 			/*
 			 * Do this under tasklist_lock to ensure that
 			 * exit_notify() can't miss ->group_exit_task
@@ -1179,6 +1180,7 @@ static int de_thread(struct task_struct *tsk)
 			if (likely(leader->exit_state))
 				break;
 			__set_current_state(TASK_KILLABLE);
+			spin_unlock(lock);
 			write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
 			cgroup_threadgroup_change_end(tsk);
 			schedule();
@@ -1234,14 +1236,17 @@ static int de_thread(struct task_struct *tsk)
 		 */
 		if (unlikely(leader->ptrace))
 			__wake_up_parent(leader, leader->parent);
+		spin_unlock(lock);
 		write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
 		cgroup_threadgroup_change_end(tsk);
 
 		release_task(leader);
 	}
 
+	spin_lock_irq(lock);
 	sig->group_exit_task = NULL;
 	sig->notify_count = 0;
+	spin_unlock_irq(lock);
 
 no_thread_group:
 	/* we have changed execution domain */
@@ -1252,10 +1257,12 @@ static int de_thread(struct task_struct *tsk)
 
 killed:
 	/* protects against exit_notify() and __exit_signal() */
-	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
+	read_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
+	spin_lock(lock);
 	sig->group_exit_task = NULL;
 	sig->notify_count = 0;
-	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
+	spin_unlock(lock);
+	read_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
 	return -EAGAIN;
 }
 
-- 
2.20.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-06-23 21:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-19 18:30 [PATCH 0/2] exec: s/group_exit_task/group_exec_task/ for clarity Eric W. Biederman
2020-06-19 18:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] exec: Don't set group_exit_task during a coredump Eric W. Biederman
2020-06-20 18:58   ` Linus Torvalds
2020-06-22 16:20     ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-06-22 16:32       ` Linus Torvalds
2020-06-22 11:25   ` Oleg Nesterov
2020-06-19 18:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] exec: Rename group_exit_task group_exec_task and correct the Documentation Eric W. Biederman
2020-06-23 21:52 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] exec: s/group_exit_task/group_exec_task/ for clarity Eric W. Biederman
2020-06-23 21:53   ` [PATCH v2 1/6] signal: Pretty up the SIGNAL_GROUP_FLAGS Eric W. Biederman
2020-06-23 21:54   ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2020-06-23 21:54   ` [PATCH v2 3/6] signal: Implement SIGNAL_GROUP_DETHREAD Eric W. Biederman
2020-06-23 21:55   ` [PATCH v2 4/6] signal: In signal_group_exit remove the group_exit_task test Eric W. Biederman
2020-06-23 21:55   ` [PATCH v2 5/6] coredump: Stop using group_exit_task Eric W. Biederman
2020-06-23 21:56   ` [PATCH v2 6/6] exec: Rename group_exit_task group_exec_task and correct the Documentation Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ftalla80.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org \
    --to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox