From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>,
acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
mingo@redhat.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com
Cc: Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com,
kan.liang@intel.com, yao.jin@intel.com,
Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/7] perf/core: Define the common branch type classification
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 22:04:02 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fue0k0gd.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1499947459-4527-2-git-send-email-yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> writes:
> It is often useful to know the branch types while analyzing branch
> data. For example, a call is very different from a conditional branch.
>
> Currently we have to look it up in binary while the binary may later
> not be available and even the binary is available but user has to take
> some time. It is very useful for user to check it directly in perf
> report.
>
> Perf already has support for disassembling the branch instruction
> to get the x86 branch type.
>
> To keep consistent on kernel and userspace and make the classification
> more common, the patch adds the common branch type classification
> in perf_event.h.
>
> The patch only defines a minimum but most common set of branch types.
>
> PERF_BR_UNKNOWN : unknown
> PERF_BR_COND :conditional
> PERF_BR_UNCOND : unconditional
> PERF_BR_IND : indirect
> PERF_BR_CALL : function call
> PERF_BR_IND_CALL : indirect function call
> PERF_BR_RET : function return
> PERF_BR_SYSCALL : syscall
> PERF_BR_SYSRET : syscall return
> PERF_BR_COND_CALL : conditional function call
> PERF_BR_COND_RET : conditional function return
>
> The patch also adds a new field type (4 bits) in perf_branch_entry
> to record the branch type.
>
> Since the disassembling of branch instruction needs some overhead,
> a new PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_TYPE_SAVE is introduced to indicate if it
> needs to disassemble the branch instruction and record the branch
> type.
Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> (powerpc)
If you like.
cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-13 12:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-13 12:04 [PATCH v8 0/7] perf report: Show branch type Jin Yao
2017-07-13 12:04 ` [PATCH v8 1/7] perf/core: Define the common branch type classification Jin Yao
2017-07-13 12:04 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2017-07-13 12:33 ` Jin, Yao
2017-07-13 12:04 ` [PATCH v8 2/7] perf/x86/intel: Record branch type Jin Yao
2017-07-13 14:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-07-13 14:53 ` Jin, Yao
2017-07-13 15:06 ` Jin, Yao
2017-07-13 15:15 ` Jin, Yao
2017-07-13 12:04 ` [PATCH v8 3/7] perf record: Create a new option save_type in --branch-filter Jin Yao
2017-07-13 12:04 ` [PATCH v8 4/7] perf report: Refactor the branch info printing code Jin Yao
2017-07-13 12:04 ` [PATCH v8 5/7] perf util: Create branch.c/.h for common branch functions Jin Yao
2017-07-13 12:04 ` [PATCH v8 6/7] perf report: Show branch type statistics for stdio mode Jin Yao
2017-07-13 12:04 ` [PATCH v8 7/7] perf report: Show branch type in callchain entry Jin Yao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87fue0k0gd.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au \
--to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=yao.jin@intel.com \
--cc=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox