public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
To: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>,
	dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: virt-dma: fix completion list manipulation
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 23:03:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fv9n12h6.fsf@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54F4D631.6020605@metafoo.de> (Lars-Peter Clausen's message of "Mon, 02 Mar 2015 22:29:21 +0100")

Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de> writes:

> On 03/02/2015 10:19 PM, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/virt-dma.h b/drivers/dma/virt-dma.h
>> index 3772032..2a3da22 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dma/virt-dma.h
>> +++ b/drivers/dma/virt-dma.h
>> @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static inline void vchan_cookie_complete(struct virt_dma_desc *vd)
>>   	dma_cookie_complete(&vd->tx);
>>   	dev_vdbg(vc->chan.device->dev, "txd %p[%x]: marked complete\n",
>>   		 vd, cookie);
>> -	list_add_tail(&vd->node, &vc->desc_completed);
>> +	list_move_tail(&vd->node, &vc->desc_completed);
>
> That will break all drivers which handle this currently correctly and remove the
> descriptor from any list before calling vchan_cookie_complete.
Ah, well well I don't agree.

First, let's split the drivers which remove the descriptors and these which
don't :

These which remove the descriptor:
dma-jz4740.c
fsl-edma.c

These which don't remove the descriptor:
amba-pl08x.c
edma.c
img-mdc-dma.c
k3dma.c
moxart-dma.c
omap-dma.c
qcom_bam_dma.c
s3c24xx-dma.c
sa11x0-dma.c
sun6i-dma.c

That settles the correctness I think, the correct behavior is to not remove the
descriptor and let it be done by vchan_cookie_complete().

Now for the remaining 2 drivers, we'll have :
 - list_del(&vd->node) => vd becomes a singleton
 - list_move_tail(&vd->node, &...desc_completed)
   => list_del(&vd->node) : nothing changes, it's a nop
   => list_add_tail(&vd->node, &...desc_completed)

And the behavior remains correct after the patch, only one "list_del()" is done
twice for nothing. Where do you see any breakage ?

Cheers.

-- 
Robert

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-02 22:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-02 21:19 [PATCH] dmaengine: virt-dma: fix completion list manipulation Robert Jarzmik
2015-03-02 21:29 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2015-03-02 22:03   ` Robert Jarzmik [this message]
2015-03-03  7:23     ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2015-03-03 10:27       ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-03-03 11:21         ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2015-03-03 11:55           ` Robert Jarzmik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87fv9n12h6.fsf@free.fr \
    --to=robert.jarzmik@free.fr \
    --cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox