From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755297AbbAGXMk (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jan 2015 18:12:40 -0500 Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.232]:38550 "EHLO out02.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754406AbbAGXMg (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jan 2015 18:12:36 -0500 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Tejun Heo Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" , Richard Weinberger , Linux API , Linux Containers , Serge Hallyn , "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" , Andy Lutomirski , cgroups mailinglist , Ingo Molnar References: <87lhlgpyxk.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <54AB2992.6060707@nod.at> <54ACFC38.5070007@nod.at> <87fvbmir9q.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <20150107193059.GA1857@mail.hallyn.com> <87bnma6xwv.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <20150107224430.GA28414@htj.dyndns.org> <878uhe42km.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <20150107230615.GA28630@htj.dyndns.org> Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 17:09:53 -0600 In-Reply-To: <20150107230615.GA28630@htj.dyndns.org> (Tejun Heo's message of "Wed, 7 Jan 2015 18:06:15 -0500") Message-ID: <87fvbm2nni.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX1/hxL/XHj6lh4cXiEVLlBa0W03z+s03mng= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 97.121.85.189 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5000] * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa06 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.5 XM_Body_Dirty_Words Contains a dirty word X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa06 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: *;Tejun Heo X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 174 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.04 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 3.2 (1.8%), b_tie_ro: 2.3 (1.3%), parse: 0.69 (0.4%), extract_message_metadata: 2.2 (1.3%), get_uri_detail_list: 0.71 (0.4%), tests_pri_-1000: 3.7 (2.1%), tests_pri_-950: 1.30 (0.7%), tests_pri_-900: 1.08 (0.6%), tests_pri_-400: 20 (11.7%), check_bayes: 19 (11.1%), b_tokenize: 4.6 (2.6%), b_tok_get_all: 9 (5.1%), b_comp_prob: 1.69 (1.0%), b_tok_touch_all: 2.4 (1.4%), b_finish: 0.55 (0.3%), tests_pri_0: 128 (73.8%), tests_pri_500: 4.3 (2.5%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 8/8] cgroup: Add documentation for cgroup namespaces X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 24 Sep 2014 11:00:52 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Tejun Heo writes: > On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 05:02:17PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> Ignoring namespace details for a moment. The following should be >> possible with a unified hierarchy. If it is not it is a show stopper >> of a regression. > > The -o SUBSYS option doesn't exist. Jesus, at least get yourself > familiar with the basics before claiming random stuff. Not random and I am familiar thank you very much. I may have mistyped the manual command line configuration for specifying which controllers appear on a mount point does not alter my point. The old options to enable selecting controllers need to continue and need to continue to work with a unified hierarchy. Anything else is a gratuitious regression. Eric