Re: [PATCH] genirq: do not disable IRQ_WAKEUP marked irqs on suspend

[Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>]

Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> writes:

> commit 0a0c5168df (PM: Introduce functions for suspending and resuming
> device interrupts) iterates through all interrupts and disables them
> on the hardware level. Some architectures have functionality
> implemented to mark an interrupt source as wakeup source for suspend,
> but the new power management code disables them unconditionally which
> breaks the resume on interrupt functionality.
>
> The wakeup interrupts are marked in the status with the IRQ_WAKEUP
> bit. Skip the disablement for those interrupts which have the
> IRQ_WAKEUP bit set.
>     
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: stable@kernel.org

Hi Thomas,

I posted the same patch last month and lost the argument, original
thread here:

  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/6/549

Kevin


> diff --git a/kernel/irq/pm.c b/kernel/irq/pm.c
> index 638d8be..bce6afd 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/pm.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/pm.c
> @@ -29,7 +29,8 @@ void suspend_device_irqs(void)
>  		unsigned long flags;
>  
>  		spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags);
> -		__disable_irq(desc, irq, true);
> +		if (!(desc->status & IRQ_WAKEUP))
> +			__disable_irq(desc, irq, true);
>  		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
>  	}
>  
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/