From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262425AbTJITkB (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Oct 2003 15:40:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262433AbTJITkB (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Oct 2003 15:40:01 -0400 Received: from topaz-57.mcs.anl.gov ([140.221.57.209]:39299 "EHLO topaz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262425AbTJITj6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Oct 2003 15:39:58 -0400 To: Patrick Mochel Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: pmdisk performance problem References: From: Narayan Desai Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 14:39:42 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Patrick Mochel's message of "Thu, 9 Oct 2003 12:21:09 -0700 (PDT)") Message-ID: <87fzi2jj41.fsf@mcs.anl.gov> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Reasonable Discussion, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>>> "Pat" == Patrick Mochel writes: >> When using 2.6.0-test7 on an ibm thinkpad t21, pmdisk works >> properly, though it takes quite a while to write out pages to >> disk. On my last suspend to disk, it took on the order of 8-10 >> minutes. After this completed, i was able to successfully resume, >> fairly speedily, however my hardware clock was 8-10 minutes >> behind. Does anyone have any ideas why this is happening? >> thanks... Pat> Do you know if this was just for the write operation, or also Pat> included stopping all processes? This was during the write of ~4600 pages to disk. Pat> Could you increase the log-level before you suspend and let me Pat> know -- by looking at the debug messages -- what seems to take Pat> the most time? sorry, but how do i do this? thanks.. -nld