From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DE5938333C; Mon, 24 Aug 2026 18:28:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787596100; cv=none; b=Kqok3S4LYtXjZvIko20BzR4rDqvIWfkCsE36ZHKIQ8VAJsUAgBXxZ2ZxI6I64F703cK8TJ1CHRgmrPF7dFlpvljdeRzAnV0eHppH/thpj7lW4XsCiiaDNAdtxVNuD7X2vzdIUXU2dkQuhu5BKVP0axcGLRHX7hAmRrhaQlpTEAo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787596100; c=relaxed/simple; bh=l28porqIqzvAiWulWOWFAaQNdJdMa/34sQaGNlru8I8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=IHVmQJzX7UPelsFF4L0Ks20b4p8qZ6vxbt++x52oxdp/PQho3gOFmRvZydKJPkLGPYnhxCS7Ohw62sgnGPo9jMRaio+9fu+A/Y/4y2Wa/IR/iS5soDp/g0Yka2Bi3xw8dYNT4d8JV25GdmInD39z9tyF7CPYMauy6TUwzsQ9yKE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=mDSs0WHA; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="mDSs0WHA" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 12CBE408C6 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1787596098; bh=qUT3qZLebBBOJfDywttkzmdCgDrXNn+Hp1gXVFDN2lQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=mDSs0WHAV/CJcOQQGF50up6HmKvqRrg2tAtphjJlgAtHtNcQV2V/O1UYPcW25Vt/i 0+RkqIE0gEq5UaEpO7FuFKLUWgfDwlW5A07sA4V6JKy5soUd/M5NIk6gLGNboVcg5d 5cFj6TcTdd1mwvRRqpvC4FFWTok3MXyXQg7w2LPjouHJyIhTHuBF+KPxPc3LbOMQPt ylyiKb4FyjxTPuC3zw34zpdsJCRBtk/v8xVntX+lshrFOKTJwuQJj6v83Epw+DCix6 NeRTdOyaktyOY7dJt58EzQeSO77NQlJDJyhGc+2b0/9gQ//zyB/4TZE0sbkTao7sXk R6P6WYQ8PEJAA== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:814::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 12CBE408C6; Mon, 24 Aug 2026 18:28:18 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Karl Mehltretter Cc: Shuah Khan , Randy Dunlap , Thomas Gleixner , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] docs: cpu_hotplug: Fix multi-instance removal calls In-Reply-To: References: <20260822121651.1559-1-kmehltretter@gmail.com> <20260822121651.1559-2-kmehltretter@gmail.com> <87fr03zcb2.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2026 12:28:17 -0600 Message-ID: <87h5kjxtj2.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Karl Mehltretter writes: > On Mon, Aug 24, 2026 at 10:57:21AM +0100, Jonathan Corbet wrote: >> Karl Mehltretter writes: >> >> > The function is named cpuhp_state_remove_instance(), not >> > cpuhp_remove_instance(). >> > >> > Fixes: c9871c800f65 ("Documentation: core-api/cpuhotplug: Rewrite the API section") >> > Assisted-by: Codex:gpt-5.6-sol >> > Signed-off-by: Karl Mehltretter >> > --- >> > Documentation/core-api/cpu_hotplug.rst | 4 ++-- >> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> These patches could really benefit from Fixes tags. For this one, it >> should be: >> >> Fixes: c9871c800f65 ("Documentation: core-api/cpuhotplug: Rewrite the API section") >> >> Can I trouble you to fix the rest of them as well? > > Fixes tags are already there, above the Assisted-By tags. Obviously what really needed fixing was my caffeine level...sorry for the noise. jon