From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97B3B538A; Sun, 27 Oct 2024 21:57:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730066260; cv=none; b=aIlu8WKCRpiaXRj5a/FCvWyrpcr8EZDiqL/YLBCq9SqiNzEQGqgKuwRj1Dn/ZA3qBQ+s2EJ64ALT9iwp4ZbvcSmXksuKyWt9kVplS5sQzroISs0sq79iemm7TEqSoj4CclJnt6eEucGEoxAUd7MB4w8e5RIFCxjv/C6193YVTvY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730066260; c=relaxed/simple; bh=zhpA/pUJ6k/6prCSe7Jj2nIyo1Q0CSS/ioHWtzTETXg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=lP9nYCce6J+AV3ht7is1BmQa6M5wTc44KvF9pdcDzIiHOYhwp8/35D2lckN5T6RFTl1yzloU6gz0pvLzMnhy/xmFyk32ri914JJJ5itMinwrI8nv+MpJ15e2fakTVqerJkYj3cBtf++ucUC2D+oIqfr5u+t4q348SkZsbzJ6ZXc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=WFfXYvMY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="WFfXYvMY" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 0CA5942B33 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1730066252; bh=ifWpwQOiXGSyOuEBW/cbbUk+XXsVKdYLGRNKIE0JELs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=WFfXYvMYaqGAdjI5juyW2qvxrrcdWA8+Xj4WIAS7BjVtJs9axGKZMPdS/Sud0633e Heh5RMduZ7dXYdwf9ET/K9EbYGEu7z52L1uJQJr2Ym+vpV9tMyLRPF+PuhxIyxtbg9 YkOMELF0+TB0MorhiX+cL1sAxkIcH/wSC7JpV3vvsvWmRmV4Mj+sxwBJOexZiErmT0 PM726lZ2hYCf1ZSIyZLykWgSeCbj2Zi7hNZAo3panvCj+u4L2kZ61LmowG7dXTd/zp 8PteW6x2e9eX27I88qJnl/qsZ+xlx0cOmPh1AaRfkfHgMAcqIHVX3TlQkwI8laTztH VqjRxoFLV7RJQ== Received: from localhost (mdns.lwn.net [45.79.72.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0CA5942B33; Sun, 27 Oct 2024 21:57:31 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: xu xin Cc: alexs@kernel.org, fan.yu9@zte.com.cn, he.peilin@zte.com.cn, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mudongliangabcd@gmail.com, qiu.yutan@zte.com.cn, seakeel@gmail.com, si.yanteng@linux.dev, tu.qiang35@zte.com.cn, wang.yaxin@zte.com.cn, xu.xin16@zte.com.cn, zhang.yunkai@zte.com.cn Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next v8] Docs/zh_CN: Translate physical_memory.rst to Simplified Chinese In-Reply-To: <20241027133518.2972180-1-xu.xin16@zte.com.cn> References: <87ldyc1g3o.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> <20241027133518.2972180-1-xu.xin16@zte.com.cn> Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 15:57:28 -0600 Message-ID: <87h68xw6nr.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain xu xin writes: >> > From: Yaxin Wang >> > >> > This patch translates the "physical_memory.rst" document into >> > Simplified Chinese to improve accessibility for Chinese-speaking >> > developers and users. >> > >> > The translation was done with attention to technical accuracy >> > and readability, ensuring that the document remains informative >> > and useful in its translated form. >> > >> > Update to commit 7332f9e45d2e("docs/mm: Physical Memory: Fix grammar") >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Yaxin Wang >> > Signed-off-by: Jiang Kun >> > Reviewed-by: xu xin >> >> One does not normally put a Reviewed-by tag on one's own patches, so now >> I am confused. What is the role of you and Jiang Kung in the >> presentation of this patch? >> > > Let me explain that, it's because of our company email permission policy, > The author of this patch, Yaxin, has no permission to send out the patch > temporarily. So I'm just helping to send it on their behalf. and at the same time, > I'm a just reviewer, not the owner of this patch. If you handle the patch and send it onward, you need to add your own Signed-off-by tag stating your right to do so. Thanks, jon