From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5347DF503 for ; Mon, 27 May 2024 14:08:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716818921; cv=none; b=bC/4/N5EVJu6e0QDgZXWO3GTCVMDl97SzS5HfiHjA9Jn1xOIiV3/MovwPOir2I+iJ06E6ki2Fd16TFTviHqsTK/9iWTPPXI5Iwrc45pidCnyRIM1L4kNR5YErwoyL2odF308PQPEdP6E2JluMtzwZv1vG8mieyYv8DoysLlDm7Q= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716818921; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZXwbZiy8td+gubmN1p/8TtpDqubSKNzO4ViE717nqXo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=I13oI6NSMSjtdgyG5s8dx8aYZhfuqfnt0HhVmMfDnBfi1rvY2+7JaEmLJjPb1ud3/lK6fybkaJV74sM4D79NDu4T3VK1iTx3QPpimpF03OehgbV3N7EoDjeC6hqknGCpMGssPvLH5NQ73cAlCZ8GSr/dm6i/l3ANf7MPm9/eJJU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=i2fkXIN3; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="i2fkXIN3" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1716818921; x=1748354921; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date: message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZXwbZiy8td+gubmN1p/8TtpDqubSKNzO4ViE717nqXo=; b=i2fkXIN3qIZXOB6GjN8+mdHyAdSxcYPQrg4uqgFOaN5L+oxERO6bMHW6 2fLcZoiLTlIFRMge9mHZ8O7/DlC3LSQH2isSURHETggYYomos77puKs91 BEhH+FXlOffStyKDfwbNmT/xHwISpc/mpZ/DHUVLD30a3vH6Nycje4UP8 A3SBtftCVqQVa/oPcvTUIryrllkOEFQ+bhg4uQr6MMUyLZiQi+cvmY4xH 71rsqSjHv5bhxpS2wnaXo2K1osDORWq6DUairG4zBR4+4pFpgRRr777w/ t0D/qx4dWSMhODTC3/8R8UJcZN5E+y8GMs39x7Ck8JwmsbKxm27PFXlI3 w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: AtWyVuEjTjqpSOl6Ht7E5A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: CaAhchByRZO2TYEyAtGTOA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11085"; a="13314252" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,192,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="13314252" Received: from fmviesa004.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.144]) by orvoesa110.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 May 2024 07:08:40 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: WclyaCNiQxKBcSASf3gFJQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: e/YtuAi0SRKK8zGxEOOCBw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,192,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="39318700" Received: from lfiedoro-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.246.200]) by fmviesa004-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 May 2024 07:08:37 -0700 From: Jani Nikula To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Kees Cook , Andy Shevchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm: use mem_is_zero() instead of !memchr_inv(s, 0, n) In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo References: <20240527094320.2653177-1-jani.nikula@intel.com> <20240527094320.2653177-2-jani.nikula@intel.com> Date: Mon, 27 May 2024 17:08:34 +0300 Message-ID: <87h6ejmjod.fsf@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 27 May 2024, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 12:43=E2=80=AFPM Jani Nikula wrote: >> >> Use the mem_is_zero() helper where possible. > > ... > >> - if (memchr_inv(guid, 0, 16) =3D=3D NULL) { >> + if (mem_is_zero(guid, 16)) { >> tmp64 =3D get_jiffies_64(); >> memcpy(&guid[0], &tmp64, sizeof(u64)); >> memcpy(&guid[8], &tmp64, sizeof(u64)); > > What is the type of guid? Shouldn't it be guid_t with the respective > guid_is_null() I can leave out these parts of the patch. BR, Jani. > > ... > >> - if (memchr_inv(guid, 0, 16)) >> + if (!mem_is_zero(guid, 16)) >> return true; > > Ditto. --=20 Jani Nikula, Intel