From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (gandalf.ozlabs.org [150.107.74.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94288376; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 01:00:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=150.107.74.76 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713402048; cv=none; b=OZP4E0efDSNfelfX16/yzDukmlNHXb7cD/HvxGOTgAi0jW8wlkrz2FEGicHDHypupFLPoR/gIPlxGRBiC06I2D95u8yDg+MTql47HEKGH1I4BTp+1kyoyLHI78Yt3zBquVmWRyrAMiWJ2lU4B0z5fmW45hfPF7lY1NchFUTG5VY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713402048; c=relaxed/simple; bh=vTanqau4t/U+Uyls6+AXjIbwm8dSM1/9KWNhqrmGuGY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=otEjDYYAxJzUPU8dIoTzzJUQEzhpYqWb6RLecslo7r8ZwZ4efbl+X2Xji6PiyeyqT3kZvZuAkxLYYsLderBNpJKlnbS2zU9pXdS6mwkTQgfvoerdhVoOsp4UpWKKUxfGge14+y0YkmXKzNfz8ZmVkPGKU1fVKaZjuRpAjm3xSYw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ellerman.id.au; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ellerman.id.au; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ellerman.id.au header.i=@ellerman.id.au header.b=SDAV5RYY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=150.107.74.76 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ellerman.id.au Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ellerman.id.au Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ellerman.id.au header.i=@ellerman.id.au header.b="SDAV5RYY" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ellerman.id.au; s=201909; t=1713402045; bh=vTanqau4t/U+Uyls6+AXjIbwm8dSM1/9KWNhqrmGuGY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=SDAV5RYYCtv9/IfXyhzcOOOTEmUMqPzfiEGS4GgSjQnGQUV7yADPMa14Nd0rmUE/K aquXYXEUaYGpBv5GCsf8zH15kInnF/2Xi9xZigUB1VFYkbS3IWcata7UA7dTgHg+rs 7Fd+yV9yJBuUoLZkiMLrspqMbOl6FKqPUQ87rykTej4IKlGrkD83YiCNOwliRNm4yR osPxlSCN9oSgSQNXy9fbIMcKfAXI08A3mrZCyZ3alA/xpYUJRjClRlIDtlLJqY56IV SHmyD7lVNtHX7SS+8Q95mEw1DDSmFAz18MUgX1C0dHSN0cUPgvKKr58M4Yvj5nc+fc 4UEOJKGC3p1iA== Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4VKfbJ1h6Hz4wc8; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 11:00:44 +1000 (AEST) From: Michael Ellerman To: Frederic Weisbecker , Alexander Gordeev , Ingo Molnar Cc: Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , Arnd Bergmann , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Nicholas Piggin , Heiko Carstens , Vasily Gorbik Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND 0/5] sched/vtime: vtime.h headers cleanup In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 11:00:43 +1000 Message-ID: <87h6fzbi2s.fsf@mail.lhotse> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Frederic Weisbecker writes: > Le Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 05:09:43PM +0200, Alexander Gordeev a =C3=A9crit : >> Hi All, >>=20 >> There are no changes since the last post, just a re-send. >>=20 >> v2: >> - patch 4: commit message reworded (Heiko) >> - patch 5: vtime.h is removed from Kbuild scripts (PowerPC only) (Heiko) >>=20 >> v1: >> Please find a small cleanup to vtime_task_switch() wiring. >> I split it into smaller patches to allow separate PowerPC >> vs s390 reviews. Otherwise patches 2+3 and 4+5 could have >> been merged. >>=20 >> I tested it on s390 and compile-tested it on 32- and 64-bit >> PowerPC and few other major architectures only, but it is >> only of concern for CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_NATIVE-capable >> ones (AFAICT). >>=20 >> Thanks! > > It probably makes sense to apply the whole series to the scheduler tree. > Does any powerpc or s390 maintainer oppose to that? No objection. It has acks and reviews from powerpc. cheers