From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
To: "Alexis Lothoré" <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
Ajay Singh <ajay.kathat@microchip.com>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] wifi: wilc1000: fix RCU usage
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 18:19:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h6i4mnoj.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240215-wilc_fix_rcu_usage-v1-0-f610e46c6f82@bootlin.com> ("Alexis Lothoré"'s message of "Thu, 15 Feb 2024 16:36:17 +0100")
Alexis Lothoré <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com> writes:
> This small series aims to fix multiple warnings observed when enabling
> CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_LIST:
> - add missing locks to create corresponding critical read sections
> - fix mix between RCU and SRCU API usage
>
> While at it, since SRCU API is already in use in the driver, any fix done
> on RCU usage was also done with the SRCU variant of RCU API. I do not
> really get why we are using SRCU in this driver instead of classic RCU, as
> it seems to be done in any other wireless driver.
And even more so, no other driver in drivers/net use SRCU.
> My understanding is that primary SRCU use case is for compatibility
> with realtime kernel, which needs to be preemptible everywhere. Has
> the driver been really developped with this constraint in mind ? If
> you have more details about this, feel free to educate me.
Alexis, if you have the time I recommend submitting a patchset
converting wilc1000 to use classic RCU. At least I have a hard time
understanding why SRCU is needed, especially after seeing the warning
you found.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-19 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-15 15:36 [PATCH 0/4] wifi: wilc1000: fix RCU usage Alexis Lothoré
2024-02-15 15:36 ` [PATCH 1/4] wifi: wilc1000: split deeply nested RCU list traversal in dedicated helper Alexis Lothoré
2024-02-19 16:21 ` Kalle Valo
2024-02-15 15:36 ` [PATCH 2/4] wifi: wilc1000: use SRCU instead of RCU for vif list traversal Alexis Lothoré
2024-02-15 15:36 ` [PATCH 3/4] wifi: wilc1000: fix declarations ordering Alexis Lothoré
2024-02-15 15:36 ` [PATCH 4/4] wifi: wilc1000: add missing read critical sections around vif list traversal Alexis Lothoré
2024-02-19 16:19 ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2024-02-19 16:24 ` [PATCH 0/4] wifi: wilc1000: fix RCU usage Alexis Lothoré
2024-02-19 16:34 ` Kalle Valo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87h6i4mnoj.fsf@kernel.org \
--to=kvalo@kernel.org \
--cc=ajay.kathat@microchip.com \
--cc=alexis.lothore@bootlin.com \
--cc=claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox