From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: Anirudh Rayabharam <anrayabh@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: mail@anirudhrb.com, kumarpraveen@linux.microsoft.com,
Anirudh Rayabharam <anrayabh@linux.microsoft.com>,
wei.liu@kernel.org, robert.bradford@intel.com,
liuwe@microsoft.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
Ilias Stamatis <ilstam@amazon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: nVMX: Don't expose eVMCS unsupported fields to L1
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 17:19:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h742rxfh.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87bkudugri.fsf@redhat.com>
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> writes:
> Anirudh Rayabharam <anrayabh@linux.microsoft.com> writes:
>
>> When running cloud-hypervisor tests, VM entry into an L2 guest on KVM on
>> Hyper-V fails with this splat (stripped for brevity):
>>
>> [ 1481.600386] WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 7641 at arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c:4563 nested_vmx_vmexit+0x70d/0x790 [kvm_intel]
>> [ 1481.600427] CPU: 4 PID: 7641 Comm: vcpu2 Not tainted 5.15.0-1008-azure #9-Ubuntu
>> [ 1481.600429] Hardware name: Microsoft Corporation Virtual Machine/Virtual Machine, BIOS Hyper-V UEFI Release v4.1 07/22/2021
>> [ 1481.600430] RIP: 0010:nested_vmx_vmexit+0x70d/0x790 [kvm_intel]
>> [ 1481.600447] Call Trace:
>> [ 1481.600449] <TASK>
>> [ 1481.600451] nested_vmx_reflect_vmexit+0x10b/0x440 [kvm_intel]
>> [ 1481.600457] __vmx_handle_exit+0xef/0x670 [kvm_intel]
>> [ 1481.600467] vmx_handle_exit+0x12/0x50 [kvm_intel]
>> [ 1481.600472] vcpu_enter_guest+0x83a/0xfd0 [kvm]
>> [ 1481.600524] vcpu_run+0x5e/0x240 [kvm]
>> [ 1481.600560] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0xd7/0x550 [kvm]
>> [ 1481.600597] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x29a/0x6d0 [kvm]
>> [ 1481.600634] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x91/0xc0
>> [ 1481.600637] do_syscall_64+0x5c/0xc0
>> [ 1481.600667] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
>> [ 1481.600670] RIP: 0033:0x7f688becdaff
>> [ 1481.600686] </TASK>
>>
>> TSC multiplier field is currently not supported in EVMCS in KVM. It was
>> previously not supported from Hyper-V but has been added since. Because
>> it is not supported in KVM the use "TSC scaling control" is filtered out
>> of vmcs_config by evmcs_sanitize_exec_ctrls().
>>
>> However, in nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs(), TSC scaling is exposed to L1.
>> eVMCS unsupported fields are not sanitized. When L1 tries to launch an L2
>> guest, vmcs12 has TSC scaling enabled. This propagates to vmcs02. But KVM
>> doesn't set the TSC multiplier value because kvm_has_tsc_control is false.
>> Due to this VM entry for L2 guest fails. (VM entry fails if
>> "use TSC scaling" is 1 but TSC multiplier is 0.)
>>
>> To fix, in nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs(), sanitize the values read from MSRs
>> by filtering out fields that are not supported by eVMCS.
>>
>> This is a stable-friendly intermediate fix. A more comprehensive fix is
>> in progress [1] but is probably too complicated to safely apply to
>> stable.
>>
>> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20220627160440.31857-1-vkuznets@redhat.com/
>>
>> Fixes: d041b5ea93352 ("KVM: nVMX: Enable nested TSC scaling")
>> Signed-off-by: Anirudh Rayabharam <anrayabh@linux.microsoft.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>> - Sanitize all eVMCS unsupported fields instead of just TSC scaling.
>>
>> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220613161611.3567556-1-anrayabh@linux.microsoft.com/
>>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
>> index f5cb18e00e78..f88d748c7cc6 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
>> @@ -6564,6 +6564,10 @@ void nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs(struct nested_vmx_msrs *msrs, u32 ept_caps)
>> msrs->pinbased_ctls_high);
>> msrs->pinbased_ctls_low |=
>> PIN_BASED_ALWAYSON_WITHOUT_TRUE_MSR;
>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HYPERV)
>> + if (static_branch_unlikely(&enable_evmcs))
>> + msrs->pinbased_ctls_high &= ~EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_PINCTRL;
>> +#endif
>> msrs->pinbased_ctls_high &=
>> PIN_BASED_EXT_INTR_MASK |
>> PIN_BASED_NMI_EXITING |
>> @@ -6580,6 +6584,10 @@ void nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs(struct nested_vmx_msrs *msrs, u32 ept_caps)
>> msrs->exit_ctls_low =
>> VM_EXIT_ALWAYSON_WITHOUT_TRUE_MSR;
>>
>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HYPERV)
>> + if (static_branch_unlikely(&enable_evmcs))
>> + msrs->exit_ctls_high &= ~EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_VMEXIT_CTRL;
>> +#endif
>> msrs->exit_ctls_high &=
>> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>> VM_EXIT_HOST_ADDR_SPACE_SIZE |
>> @@ -6600,6 +6608,10 @@ void nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs(struct nested_vmx_msrs *msrs, u32 ept_caps)
>> msrs->entry_ctls_high);
>> msrs->entry_ctls_low =
>> VM_ENTRY_ALWAYSON_WITHOUT_TRUE_MSR;
>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HYPERV)
>> + if (static_branch_unlikely(&enable_evmcs))
>> + msrs->entry_ctls_high &= ~EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_VMENTRY_CTRL;
>> +#endif
>> msrs->entry_ctls_high &=
>> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>> VM_ENTRY_IA32E_MODE |
>> @@ -6657,6 +6669,10 @@ void nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs(struct nested_vmx_msrs *msrs, u32 ept_caps)
>> msrs->secondary_ctls_high);
>>
>> msrs->secondary_ctls_low = 0;
>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HYPERV)
>> + if (static_branch_unlikely(&enable_evmcs))
>> + msrs->secondary_ctls_high &= ~EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_2NDEXEC;
>> +#endif
>> msrs->secondary_ctls_high &=
>> SECONDARY_EXEC_DESC |
>> SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_RDTSCP |
>
> (In theory, threre's also EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_VMFUNC filtering out
> VMX_VMFUNC_EPTP_SWITCHING (as eVMCS EPTP_LIST_ADDRESS) but it is not
> used by KVM)
>
> As I said in another thread, I think this is fine as a
> stable@/intermediate fix. Assuming the way to go for mainline is my
> "KVM: nVMX: Use vmcs_config for setting up nested VMX MSRs", this patch
> won't be needed and can be reverted.
(I've already said that in another thread, putting it here for
visibility)
I have to take this back. As-is, the patch is likely to break live
migration because of the reasons expressed by Jim:
https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/CALMp9eSBLcvuNDquvSfUnaF3S3f4ZkzqDRSsz-v93ZeX=xnssg@mail.gmail.com/
In case we filter out SECONDARY_EXEC_TSC_SCALING here in
nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs(), KVM_SET_MSRS on the destination will fail
because the data will have an unsupported bit.
It seems the easiest way to go for stable@ is to actually enable TSC
scaling, like the 4 patches I've suggested here:
https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/87bkujy4z9.fsf@redhat.com/
The full solution including vmcs_config usage for
nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs() is 28 patches now, it's likely a no-go for
stable :-(
--
Vitaly
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-30 15:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-28 10:32 [PATCH v2] KVM: nVMX: Don't expose eVMCS unsupported fields to L1 Anirudh Rayabharam
2022-06-28 12:14 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-06-30 15:19 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87h742rxfh.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=anrayabh@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=ilstam@amazon.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kumarpraveen@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuwe@microsoft.com \
--cc=mail@anirudhrb.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=robert.bradford@intel.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox