Re: [RFC PATCH v3] ceph: prevent a client from exceeding the MDS maximum xattr size

Xiubo Li
2022-06-02T09:43:08Z

On 6/2/22 5:26 PM, Luís Henriques wrote:
> Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com> writes:
>
>> On 6/2/22 12:29 AM, Luís Henriques wrote:
>>> The MDS tries to enforce a limit on the total key/values in extended
>>> attributes. However, this limit is enforced only if doing a synchronous
>>> operation (MDS_OP_SETXATTR) -- if we're buffering the xattrs, the MDS
>>> doesn't have a chance to enforce these limits.
>>>
>>> This patch adds support for decoding the xattrs maximum size setting that is
>>> distributed in the mdsmap. Then, when setting an xattr, the kernel client
>>> will revert to do a synchronous operation if that maximum size is exceeded.
>>>
>>> While there, fix a dout() that would trigger a printk warning:
>>>
>>> [ 98.718078] ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>> [ 98.719012] precision 65536 too large
>>> [ 98.719039] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3755 at lib/vsprintf.c:2703 vsnprintf+0x5e3/0x600
>>> ...
>>>
>>> URL: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/55725
>>> Signed-off-by: Luís Henriques <lhenriques@suse.de>
>>> ---
>>> fs/ceph/mdsmap.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>> fs/ceph/xattr.c | 12 ++++++++----
>>> include/linux/ceph/mdsmap.h | 1 +
>>> 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> * Changes since v2
>>>
>>> Well, a lot has changed since v2! Now the xattr max value setting is
>>> obtained through the mdsmap, which needs to be decoded, and the feature
>>> that was used in the previous revision was dropped. The drawback is that
>>> the MDS isn't unable to know in advance if a client is aware of this xattr
>>> max value.
>>>
>>> * Changes since v1
>>>
>>> Added support for new feature bit to get the MDS max_xattr_pairs_size
>>> setting.
>>>
>>> Also note that this patch relies on a patch that hasn't been merged yet
>>> ("ceph: use correct index when encoding client supported features"),
>>> otherwise the new feature bit won't be correctly encoded.
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/ceph/mdsmap.c b/fs/ceph/mdsmap.c
>>> index 30387733765d..36b2bc18ca2a 100644
>>> --- a/fs/ceph/mdsmap.c
>>> +++ b/fs/ceph/mdsmap.c
>>> @@ -13,6 +13,12 @@
>>> #include "super.h"
>>> +/*
>>> + * Maximum size of xattrs the MDS can handle per inode by default. This
>>> + * includes the attribute name and 4+4 bytes for the key/value sizes.
>>> + */
>>> +#define MDS_MAX_XATTR_SIZE (1<<16) /* 64K */
>>> +
>>> #define CEPH_MDS_IS_READY(i, ignore_laggy) \
>>> (m->m_info[i].state > 0 && ignore_laggy ? true : !m->m_info[i].laggy)
>>> @@ -352,12 +358,10 @@ struct ceph_mdsmap *ceph_mdsmap_decode(void **p, void
>>> *end, bool msgr2)
>>> __decode_and_drop_type(p, end, u8, bad_ext);
>>> }
>>> if (mdsmap_ev >= 8) {
>>> - u32 name_len;
>>> /* enabled */
>>> ceph_decode_8_safe(p, end, m->m_enabled, bad_ext);
>>> - ceph_decode_32_safe(p, end, name_len, bad_ext);
>>> - ceph_decode_need(p, end, name_len, bad_ext);
>>> - *p += name_len;
>>> + /* fs_name */
>>> + ceph_decode_skip_string(p, end, bad_ext);
>>> }
>>> /* damaged */
>>> if (mdsmap_ev >= 9) {
>>> @@ -370,6 +374,21 @@ struct ceph_mdsmap *ceph_mdsmap_decode(void **p, void *end, bool msgr2)
>>> } else {
>>> m->m_damaged = false;
>>> }
>>> + if (mdsmap_ev >= 17) {
>>> + /* balancer */
>>> + ceph_decode_skip_string(p, end, bad_ext);
>>> + /* standby_count_wanted */
>>> + ceph_decode_skip_32(p, end, bad_ext);
>>> + /* old_max_mds */
>>> + ceph_decode_skip_32(p, end, bad_ext);
>>> + /* min_compat_client */
>>> + ceph_decode_skip_8(p, end, bad_ext);
>> This is incorrect.
>>
>> If mdsmap_ev == 15 the min_compat_client will be a feature_bitset_t instead of
>> int8_t.
> Hmm... can you point me at where that's done in the code? As usual, I'm
> confused with that code and simply can't see that.
>
> Also, if that happens only when mdsmap_ev == 15, then there's no problem
> because that branch is only taken if it's >= 17.

Yeah, so you should skip 32 or 32+64 bits instead here, just likes:

3536                 /* version >= 3, feature bits */
3537                 ceph_decode_32_safe(&p, end, len, bad);
3538                 if (len) {
3539                         ceph_decode_64_safe(&p, end, features, bad);
3540                         p += len - sizeof(features);
3541                 }

For the ceph code please see:

Please see https://github.com/ceph/ceph/blob/main/src/mds/MDSMap.cc#L925.

>>
>>> + /* required_client_features */
>>> + ceph_decode_skip_set(p, end, 64, bad_ext);
>>> + ceph_decode_64_safe(p, end, m->m_max_xattr_size, bad_ext);
>>> + } else {
>>> + m->m_max_xattr_size = MDS_MAX_XATTR_SIZE;
>>> + }
>>> bad_ext:
>>> dout("mdsmap_decode m_enabled: %d, m_damaged: %d, m_num_laggy: %d\n",
>>> !!m->m_enabled, !!m->m_damaged, m->m_num_laggy);
>>> diff --git a/fs/ceph/xattr.c b/fs/ceph/xattr.c
>>> index 8c2dc2c762a4..67f046dac35c 100644
>>> --- a/fs/ceph/xattr.c
>>> +++ b/fs/ceph/xattr.c
>>> @@ -1086,7 +1086,7 @@ static int ceph_sync_setxattr(struct inode *inode, const char *name,
>>> flags |= CEPH_XATTR_REMOVE;
>>> }
>>> - dout("setxattr value=%.*s\n", (int)size, value);
>>> + dout("setxattr value size: %ld\n", size);
>>> /* do request */
>>> req = ceph_mdsc_create_request(mdsc, op, USE_AUTH_MDS);
>>> @@ -1184,8 +1184,14 @@ int __ceph_setxattr(struct inode *inode, const char *name,
>>> spin_lock(&ci->i_ceph_lock);
>>> retry:
>>> issued = __ceph_caps_issued(ci, NULL);
>>> - if (ci->i_xattrs.version == 0 || !(issued & CEPH_CAP_XATTR_EXCL))
>>> + required_blob_size = __get_required_blob_size(ci, name_len, val_len);
>>> + if ((ci->i_xattrs.version == 0) || !(issued & CEPH_CAP_XATTR_EXCL) ||
>>> + (required_blob_size >= mdsc->mdsmap->m_max_xattr_size)) {
>> Shouldn't it be '>' instead ?
> Ok, I'll fix that.
>
>> We'd better always force to do a sync request with old ceph. Just check if the
>> mdsmap_ev < 17. It's not safe to buffer it because it maybe discarded as your
>> ceph PR does.
> Right, that can be done. So, I can simply set the m_max_xattr_size to '0'
> if mdsmap_ev < 17. Then, this 'if' condition will always be evaluated to
> true because required_blob_size will be > 0. Does that sound OK?

Yeah, sounds good.

-- Xiubo

>
> Cheers,