From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Tong Zhang <ztong0001@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] genirq/msi: fix crash when handling Multi-MSI
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 11:36:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h7a28uhj.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA5qM4CfExWdg=Gp8OshKgYsi0A82nzTA1Uqu6nc_MQmdBfWzg@mail.gmail.com>
Please avoid top-posting.
On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 10:10:13 +0000,
Tong Zhang <ztong0001@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> ops->msi_check could point to pci_msi_domain_check_cap that is the
> function in question
>
> hence we can have following call stack
>
> pci_msi_domain_check_cap (used by ops->msi_check(domain, info, dev))
> msi_domain_prepare_irqs
> __msi_domain_alloc_irqs
> msi_domain_alloc_irqs_descs_locked
>
> What I am suggesting is commit 0f62d941acf9 changed how this return
> value is being handled and created a UAF
OK, this makes more sense.
But msi_domain_prepare_irqs() shouldn't fail in this case, and we
should proceed with the allocation of at least one vector, which isn't
happening here.
Also, if __msi_domain_alloc_irqs() is supposed to return the number of
irqs allocated, it isn't doing it consistently.
Thomas, can you shed some light on what is the intended behaviour
here?
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-17 11:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-17 9:27 [PATCH v1] genirq/msi: fix crash when handling Multi-MSI Tong Zhang
2022-01-17 9:59 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-01-17 10:10 ` Tong Zhang
2022-01-17 11:36 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2022-01-18 14:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-01-19 0:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-01-19 17:54 ` [PATCH] PCI/MSI: Prevent UAF in error path Thomas Gleixner
2022-01-19 18:37 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-01-19 18:54 ` Tong Zhang
2022-01-21 1:18 ` [tip: irq/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87h7a28uhj.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=ztong0001@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).