From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>
To: Wesley Cheng <wcheng@codeaurora.org>, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
jackp@codeaurora.org, Wesley Cheng <wcheng@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: gadget: Disable gadget IRQ during pullup disable
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 14:09:19 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h7i60ye8.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1621571037-1424-1-git-send-email-wcheng@codeaurora.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1791 bytes --]
Wesley Cheng <wcheng@codeaurora.org> writes:
> Current sequence utilizes dwc3_gadget_disable_irq() alongside
> synchronize_irq() to ensure that no further DWC3 events are generated.
> However, the dwc3_gadget_disable_irq() API only disables device
> specific events. Endpoint events can still be generated. Briefly
> disable the interrupt line, so that the cleanup code can run to
> prevent device and endpoint events. (i.e. __dwc3_gadget_stop() and
> dwc3_stop_active_transfers() respectively)
>
> Without doing so, it can lead to both the interrupt handler and the
> pullup disable routine both writing to the GEVNTCOUNT register, which
> will cause an incorrect count being read from future interrupts.
>
> Fixes: ae7e86108b12 ("usb: dwc3: Stop active transfers before halting the controller")
> Signed-off-by: Wesley Cheng <wcheng@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c | 11 +++++------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
> index 49ca5da..89aa9ac 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
> @@ -2260,13 +2260,10 @@ static int dwc3_gadget_pullup(struct usb_gadget *g, int is_on)
> }
>
> /*
> - * Synchronize any pending event handling before executing the controller
> - * halt routine.
> + * Synchronize and disable any further event handling while controller
> + * is being enabled/disabled.
> */
> - if (!is_on) {
> - dwc3_gadget_disable_irq(dwc);
> - synchronize_irq(dwc->irq_gadget);
> - }
> + disable_irq(dwc->irq_gadget);
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&dwc->lock, flags);
spin_lock_irqsave() is already disabling interrupt, right? Why do we
need another call to disable_irq()?
--
balbi
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 511 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-10 11:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-21 4:23 [PATCH] usb: dwc3: gadget: Disable gadget IRQ during pullup disable Wesley Cheng
2021-06-10 11:09 ` Felipe Balbi [this message]
2021-06-10 18:21 ` Wesley Cheng
2021-06-10 20:27 ` Wesley Cheng
2021-06-11 7:23 ` Felipe Balbi
2021-06-14 7:39 ` Jack Pham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87h7i60ye8.fsf@kernel.org \
--to=balbi@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jackp@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wcheng@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox