From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
To: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>,
Lingutla Chandrasekhar <clingutla@codeaurora.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
Pavan Kondeti <pkondeti@codeaurora.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] sched/fair: Introduce a CPU capacity comparison helper
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2021 16:59:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h7kjo141.mognet@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b03ae299-0b0c-3090-4d16-edbf2bdd5edb@arm.com>
On 06/04/21 17:37, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> On 01/04/2021 21:30, Valentin Schneider wrote:
>> While at it, replace group_smaller_{min, max}_cpu_capacity() with
>> comparisons of the source group's min/max capacity and the destination
>> CPU's capacity.
>
> IMHO, you haven't mentioned why you replace local sched group with dst
> CPU. I can see that only the capacity of the dst CPU makes really sense
> here. Might be worth mentioning in the patch header why. There is some
> of it in v3 6/7 but that's a different change.
>
Right, some of it got lost in the shuffling. This was a separate change in
v1 (4/8). I can reuse that changelog into:
"""
Also note that comparing capacity extrema of local and source sched_group's
doesn't make much sense when at the day of the day the imbalance will be
pulled by a known env->dst_cpu, whose capacity can be anywhere within the
local group's capacity extrema.
While at it, replace group_smaller_{min, max}_cpu_capacity() with
comparisons of the source group's min/max capacity and the destination
CPU's capacity.
"""
> Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
>
> [...]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-06 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-01 19:30 [PATCH v4 0/3] sched/fair: load-balance vs capacity margins Valentin Schneider
2021-04-01 19:30 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] sched/fair: Ignore percpu threads for imbalance pulls Valentin Schneider
2021-04-02 12:52 ` Vincent Guittot
2021-04-06 15:35 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2021-04-06 15:55 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-04-01 19:30 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] sched/fair: Clean up active balance nr_balance_failed trickery Valentin Schneider
2021-04-02 12:57 ` Vincent Guittot
2021-04-06 15:36 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2021-04-01 19:30 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] sched/fair: Introduce a CPU capacity comparison helper Valentin Schneider
2021-04-02 13:04 ` Vincent Guittot
2021-04-06 15:37 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2021-04-06 15:59 ` Valentin Schneider [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87h7kjo141.mognet@arm.com \
--to=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=clingutla@codeaurora.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pkondeti@codeaurora.org \
--cc=qais.yousef@arm.com \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox