From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934641AbdGTMZ6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Jul 2017 08:25:58 -0400 Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.232]:56096 "EHLO out02.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934399AbdGTMZY (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Jul 2017 08:25:24 -0400 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kirill Tkhai References: <20170720132549.0f086e4a@canb.auug.org.au> Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 07:17:03 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20170720132549.0f086e4a@canb.auug.org.au> (Stephen Rothwell's message of "Thu, 20 Jul 2017 13:25:49 +1000") Message-ID: <87h8y79ubk.fsf@xmission.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-SPF: eid=1dYAVq-0003te-7q;;;mid=<87h8y79ubk.fsf@xmission.com>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=67.3.213.87;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX1+657EIO+hx+1CuEbt3uQhwKfwMW5G61hw= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 67.3.213.87 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 BAYES_20 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 5 to 20% * [score: 0.1525] * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa07 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa07 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;Stephen Rothwell X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 5298 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.03 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 2.5 (0.0%), b_tie_ro: 1.79 (0.0%), parse: 0.65 (0.0%), extract_message_metadata: 10 (0.2%), get_uri_detail_list: 0.73 (0.0%), tests_pri_-1000: 2.6 (0.0%), tests_pri_-950: 1.06 (0.0%), tests_pri_-900: 0.87 (0.0%), tests_pri_-400: 15 (0.3%), check_bayes: 14 (0.3%), b_tokenize: 4.1 (0.1%), b_tok_get_all: 4.8 (0.1%), b_comp_prob: 1.38 (0.0%), b_tok_touch_all: 1.92 (0.0%), b_finish: 0.54 (0.0%), tests_pri_0: 1093 (20.6%), check_dkim_signature: 0.41 (0.0%), check_dkim_adsp: 878 (16.6%), tests_pri_500: 4171 (78.7%), poll_dns_idle: 4163 (78.6%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the userns tree X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Stephen Rothwell writes: > Hi Eric, > > After merging the userns tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this: > > kernel/pid_namespace.c: In function 'create_pid_namespace': > kernel/pid_namespace.c:105:7: error: too many arguments to function 'in_userns' > if (!in_userns(parent_pid_ns->user_ns, user_ns)) > ^ > In file included from kernel/pid_namespace.c:13:0: > include/linux/user_namespace.h:148:20: note: declared here > static inline bool in_userns(const struct user_namespace *target_ns) > ^ > > Caused by commit > > 1f1b28d80cd9 ("userns,pidns: Verify the userns for new pid namespaces") > > I have used the userns tree from next-20170719 for today. *scratches my head* Yes. That isn't a powerpc specific bug. This has been in my for-testing branch forever. I thought this had received plenty of build testing but apparently not. I will get this sorted out. Thank you very much. Eric