From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tags: honor COMPILED_SOURCE with apart output directory
Date: Thu, 04 May 2017 08:29:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h911yw1t.fsf@belgarion.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK7LNARpU2Stv2=jWiK2z1WxY-EnKACkJbnFWOaD1POigGvSug@mail.gmail.com> (Masahiro Yamada's message of "Sun, 30 Apr 2017 23:53:05 +0900")
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> writes:
> Hi Robert,
>
> 2017-04-26 5:07 GMT+09:00 Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>:
>> Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> writes:
>>
>>> Hi Robert,
>>>> diff --git a/scripts/tags.sh b/scripts/tags.sh
>>>> index a2ff3388e5ea..35cb64d5211c 100755
>>>> --- a/scripts/tags.sh
>>>> +++ b/scripts/tags.sh
>>>> @@ -106,7 +106,8 @@ all_compiled_sources()
>>>> case "$i" in
>>>> *.[cS])
>>>> j=${i/\.[cS]/\.o}
>>>> - if [ -e $j ]; then
>>>> + k="${j#$tree}"
>>>> + if [ -e $j -o -e "$k" ]; then
>>>
>>>
>>> Do we need to check both srctree and objtree?
>>> I think checking objtree (after $tree is ripped off) is enough.
>>
>> If I remember correctly, as this goes back a couple of monthes when I made the
>> tests of this patch, the srctree is checked for the case when the kernel is
>> compiled without O=, and objtree for the case with O=.
>
>
> I thought of this too, but if O= is given, objects in srctree
> should not be checked.
>
> For example, the kernel may be compiled for ARCH=arm with O= first,
> then for ARCH=x86 without O= second.
>
> If we include objects from both trees, the generated tag file
> will be a mixture of arm and x86.
That's true, but is this case worth an additional test for this case, ie. is it
a case anybody uses ? Given that that this tags generation never worked for out
of tree builds, I was thinking it wasn't worth a :
[[ (-z $O -a -e $j) || (-n $O -a -e $k) ]];
Cheers.
--
Robert
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-04 6:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-15 16:35 [PATCH v2] tags: honor COMPILED_SOURCE with apart output directory Robert Jarzmik
2017-01-23 6:22 ` Robert Jarzmik
2017-02-14 7:33 ` Robert Jarzmik
2017-04-24 18:06 ` Masahiro Yamada
2017-04-25 20:07 ` Robert Jarzmik
2017-04-30 14:53 ` Masahiro Yamada
2017-05-04 6:29 ` Robert Jarzmik [this message]
2017-05-06 15:57 ` Masahiro Yamada
2017-06-05 6:05 ` Masahiro Yamada
2017-06-05 6:16 ` Masahiro Yamada
2017-06-05 12:00 ` Robert Jarzmik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87h911yw1t.fsf@belgarion.home \
--to=robert.jarzmik@free.fr \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mmarek@suse.com \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox