From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: "Alex Ng \(LIS\)" <alexng@microsoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
"devel\@linuxdriverproject.org" <devel@linuxdriverproject.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] hv_util: use do_adjtimex() to update system time
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2017 19:14:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h9586qyh.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170109095827.0cc364ad@xeon-e3> (Stephen Hemminger's message of "Mon, 9 Jan 2017 09:58:27 -0800")
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> writes:
> On Mon, 09 Jan 2017 18:40:15 +0100
> Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> writes:
>>
>> > An alternative would be for hyper-v util to provide a clocksource device and
>> > let NTP manage the adjustment. The advantage of this would be HV util not fighting
>> > with NTP, and using standard API's. The downside would be the complexity of configuring
>> > NTP, and difficulty of writing a clock source pseudo device.
>>
>> Yes, I see this option. But as I wrote to John I'm afraid we'll have to
>> come up with a custom interface from hv_util to userspace which no NTP
>> server will want to support (because, first of all, it's not about
>> 'network time' any more). We can write our own daemon which will read
>> from this interface and do adjtimex but in this case I don't see much
>> value in this data traveling from kernel to userspace and back...
>>
>
> Master NTP servers are connected to authoritative clock sources. I have no idea how
> that is configured, but it should be possible.
As far as I understand these servers are connected to GPS receivers or
something like that and we can probably pretend being one but I'm not
sure that the TimeSync v4 protocol fits there, we'll probably lose the
precision - currently we calculate the delta in a small kernel function
with interrupts disabled, in my tests I see it floating around several
hundred - few thousand nanoseconds from host's time.
--
Vitaly
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-09 18:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-02 19:41 [PATCH 0/4] hv_util: adjust system time smoothly Vitaly Kuznetsov
2017-01-02 19:41 ` [PATCH 1/4] timekeeping: export do_adjtimex() to modules Vitaly Kuznetsov
2017-01-02 19:41 ` [PATCH 2/4] hv_util: switch to using timespec64 Vitaly Kuznetsov
2017-01-02 19:41 ` [PATCH 3/4] hv_util: use do_adjtimex() to update system time Vitaly Kuznetsov
2017-01-02 23:24 ` Alex Ng (LIS)
2017-01-03 12:32 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2017-01-03 19:48 ` Alex Ng (LIS)
2017-01-09 17:19 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-01-09 17:40 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2017-01-09 17:58 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-01-09 18:14 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
2017-01-09 18:31 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-01-02 19:41 ` [PATCH 4/4] hv_util: improve time adjustment accuracy by disabling interrupts Vitaly Kuznetsov
2017-01-02 19:50 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-01-03 12:28 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87h9586qyh.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com \
--to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=alexng@microsoft.com \
--cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox