* [PATCH 0309/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
@ 2016-08-02 10:58 Baole Ni
2016-08-03 2:37 ` Rusty Russell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Baole Ni @ 2016-08-02 10:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rpurdie, j.anaszewski, hal.rosenstock, dledford, sean.hefty, bp
Cc: lguest, linux-kernel, rusty, mingo, chuansheng.liu, baolex.ni
I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
---
drivers/lguest/interrupts_and_traps.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/lguest/interrupts_and_traps.c b/drivers/lguest/interrupts_and_traps.c
index 67392b6..ebd3723 100644
--- a/drivers/lguest/interrupts_and_traps.c
+++ b/drivers/lguest/interrupts_and_traps.c
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
/* Allow Guests to use a non-128 (ie. non-Linux) syscall trap. */
static unsigned int syscall_vector = IA32_SYSCALL_VECTOR;
-module_param(syscall_vector, uint, 0444);
+module_param(syscall_vector, uint, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
/* The address of the interrupt handler is split into two bits: */
static unsigned long idt_address(u32 lo, u32 hi)
--
2.9.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0309/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
2016-08-02 10:58 [PATCH 0309/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Baole Ni
@ 2016-08-03 2:37 ` Rusty Russell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Rusty Russell @ 2016-08-03 2:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Baole Ni, rpurdie, j.anaszewski, hal.rosenstock, dledford,
sean.hefty, bp
Cc: lguest, linux-kernel, mingo, chuansheng.liu, baolex.ni
Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> writes:
> I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
> when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
> As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
> and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
> thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
I find the numbers far, far more readable.
Cheers,
Rusty.
> /* Allow Guests to use a non-128 (ie. non-Linux) syscall trap. */
> static unsigned int syscall_vector = IA32_SYSCALL_VECTOR;
> -module_param(syscall_vector, uint, 0444);
> +module_param(syscall_vector, uint, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
>
> /* The address of the interrupt handler is split into two bits: */
> static unsigned long idt_address(u32 lo, u32 hi)
> --
> 2.9.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-08-03 2:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-08-02 10:58 [PATCH 0309/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Baole Ni
2016-08-03 2:37 ` Rusty Russell
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox