From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933634AbbI2IuN (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Sep 2015 04:50:13 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:35881 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933143AbbI2Ipo (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Sep 2015 04:45:44 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,607,1437462000"; d="scan'208";a="654194957" From: "Huang\, Ying" To: David Ahern Cc: Huang Ying , , LKML , "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: [lkp] [net] 192132b9a0: -17.5% netperf.Throughput_tps References: <87eghtb7e8.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com> <55FF5B08.7010807@cumulusnetworks.com> <1442799211.8474.49.camel@intel.com> <5602EA12.2010102@cumulusnetworks.com> <1443055070.8829.36.camel@intel.com> <56036A05.8000805@cumulusnetworks.com> Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 16:45:41 +0800 In-Reply-To: <56036A05.8000805@cumulusnetworks.com> (David Ahern's message of "Wed, 23 Sep 2015 21:12:05 -0600") Message-ID: <87h9mdlikq.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org David Ahern writes: > On 9/23/15 6:37 PM, Huang Ying wrote: >>> >>> I take it you have CONFIG_NET_VRF enabled. correct? >>> >>> With it disabled I see no relevant change in performance between >>> 8f58336d3f78 and 192132b9a034. Can you confirm? >> >> The kconfig file is attached with the mail. It appears that >> CONFIG_NET_VRF is disabled. >> > > Something is not adding up. I anticipate access to a multi-socket numa > system in the next few days. Until then a couple of questions: > > 1. do you take patches to run your tests? No. We checkout your commits and test them. Without applying any other patches. > 2. do you have a wiki/web page with all of the tests run? Sorry, we still have no this information now. > I'd like to > know what other networking tests have been run. Only this one was > flagged, so I presume it means other tests did not hit the > threshold. I would like to know what other tests are run. For the commit and its parent, we have only tested the benchmark in the report email. Best Regards, Huang, Ying