From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: P5A5Aeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, vincent.weaver@maine.edu, eranian@google.com,
jolsa@redhat.com, kan.liang@intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/11] perf/x86: Improve HT workaround GP counter constraint
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 16:33:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h9qy29t5.fsf@tassilo.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150522133135.447912500@infradead.org> (Peter Zijlstra's message of "Fri, 22 May 2015 15:29:07 +0200")
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> writes:
> + */
> + if (is_ht_workaround_enabled() && !cpuc->is_fake &&
Could this function also check if at least one leaking event is
scheduled somewhere? (e.g. from a global count)
-Andi
--
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-26 23:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-22 13:29 [PATCH v2 00/11] Various x86 pmu scheduling patches Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-22 13:29 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] perf,x86: Fix event/group validation Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-22 13:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-26 9:24 ` Stephane Eranian
2015-05-26 10:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-26 11:46 ` Stephane Eranian
2015-05-26 12:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-26 12:25 ` Stephane Eranian
2015-05-26 13:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-26 13:44 ` Stephane Eranian
2015-05-22 13:29 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] perf/x86: Improve HT workaround GP counter constraint Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-22 13:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-26 9:37 ` Stephane Eranian
2015-05-26 10:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-26 11:47 ` Stephane Eranian
2015-05-26 13:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-26 16:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-27 9:01 ` Stephane Eranian
2015-05-27 10:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-27 11:39 ` Stephane Eranian
2015-05-27 10:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-27 11:44 ` Stephane Eranian
2015-05-26 23:33 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2015-05-27 7:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-27 14:00 ` Andi Kleen
2015-05-22 13:29 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] perf/x86: Correct local vs remote sibling state Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-26 11:48 ` Stephane Eranian
2015-05-22 13:29 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] perf/x86: Use lockdep Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-22 13:29 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] perf/x86: Simplify dynamic constraint code somewhat Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-22 13:29 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] perf/x86: Make WARNs consistent Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-22 13:29 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] perf/x86: Move intel_commit_scheduling() Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-22 13:29 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] perf/x86: Remove pointless tests Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-22 13:29 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] perf/x86: Remove intel_excl_states::init_state Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-22 13:29 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] perf,x86: Simplify logic Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-22 13:29 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] perf/x86: Simplify put_exclusive_constraints Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-22 13:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87h9qy29t5.fsf@tassilo.jf.intel.com \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=vincent.weaver@maine.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox