From: "Bjørn Mork" <bjorn@mork.no>
To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Subject: Re: Bisected post-3.9 regression: Resume takes 5 times as much time as with v3.9
Date: Sun, 12 May 2013 18:13:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87hai8kwgh.fsf@nemi.mork.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130512113157.GG3648@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (Paul E. McKenney's message of "Sun, 12 May 2013 04:31:57 -0700")
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3177 bytes --]
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> We don't want to back out the RCU_FAST_NO_HZ changes due to their
> energy-efficiency benefits.
Yes, that's what I assumed. Just didn't know where to start dissecting
it...
> So could you please try out Borislav's
> patch below? He ran into the same issue a few weeks ago, and this
> one fixed it for him.
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> rcu: Expedite grace periods during suspend/resume
>
> CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ can increase grace-period durations by up to
> a factor of four, which can result in long suspend and resume times.
> Thus, this commit temporarily switches to expedited grace periods when
> suspending the box and return to normal settings when resuming.
>
> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
> index a9610d1..d9604a4 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> #include <linux/stop_machine.h>
> #include <linux/random.h>
> +#include <linux/suspend.h>
>
> #include "rcutree.h"
> #include <trace/events/rcu.h>
> @@ -3003,6 +3004,22 @@ static int __cpuinit rcu_cpu_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
> return NOTIFY_OK;
> }
>
> +static int rcu_pm_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
> + unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
> +{
> + switch (action) {
> + case PM_HIBERNATION_PREPARE:
> + rcu_expedited = 1;
> + break;
> + case PM_POST_RESTORE:
> + rcu_expedited = 0;
> + break;
> + default:
> + break;
> + }
> + return NOTIFY_OK;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Spawn the kthread that handles this RCU flavor's grace periods.
> */
> @@ -3243,6 +3260,7 @@ void __init rcu_init(void)
> * or the scheduler are operational.
> */
> cpu_notifier(rcu_cpu_notify, 0);
> + pm_notifier(rcu_pm_notify, 0);
> for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
> rcu_cpu_notify(NULL, CPU_UP_PREPARE, (void *)(long)cpu);
> }
Thanks! This patch did not make any difference for me by itself, for
pretty obvious reasons (I didn't time restore from hibernate - only from
suspend). But it pointed me in the right direction. Applying the
attached patch on top of that one fixed the problem.
Note that I'm also changing the restore from hibernate hook. According
to Documentation/power/notifiers.txt :
PM_POST_RESTORE An error occurred during restore from hibernation.
Device drivers' restore callbacks have been executed
and tasks have been thawed.
I believe Borislav must have meant
PM_POST_HIBERNATION The system memory state has been restored from a
hibernation image or an error occurred during
hibernation. Device drivers' restore callbacks have
been executed and tasks have been thawed.
in the above patch?
Please include some combination of these patches in your upcoming v3.10
fixes. Thanks.
Bjørn
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-rcu-Really-switch-to-expedited-grace-periods-for-sus.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 1300 bytes --]
>From cf169d21274911fea4b6a89a0a2c7b370d9de441 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Bj=C3=B8rn=20Mork?= <bjorn@mork.no>
Date: Sun, 12 May 2013 17:51:10 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] rcu: Really switch to expedited grace periods for suspend
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
commit 587ff2cf ("rcu: Expedite grace periods during suspend/resume")
enabled expedited grace periods for hibernation, but not for suspend.
The same issue applies to both cases, so apply the same logic.
Restoring on post hibernation and post suspend, but not on post
restore, which only applies to the restore error case.
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@mork.no>
---
kernel/rcutree.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index 6934238..2dcbf84 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -3103,9 +3103,11 @@ static int rcu_pm_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
{
switch (action) {
case PM_HIBERNATION_PREPARE:
+ case PM_SUSPEND_PREPARE:
rcu_expedited = 1;
break;
- case PM_POST_RESTORE:
+ case PM_POST_HIBERNATION:
+ case PM_POST_SUSPEND:
rcu_expedited = 0;
break;
default:
--
1.7.10.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-12 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-11 18:04 Bisected post-3.9 regression: Resume takes 5 times as much time as with v3.9 Bjørn Mork
2013-05-12 11:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-12 16:13 ` Bjørn Mork [this message]
2013-05-12 16:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-05-12 16:56 ` Bjørn Mork
2013-05-12 17:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-05-13 11:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-13 12:00 ` [PATCH] hibernate: Correct documentation Borislav Petkov
2013-05-14 6:34 ` Rob Landley
2013-05-14 7:42 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-05-14 10:38 ` Bisected post-3.9 regression: Resume takes 5 times as much time as with v3.9 Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-12 18:29 ` Joerg Roedel
2013-05-12 20:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-12 21:34 ` Joerg Roedel
2013-05-13 1:35 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-13 6:00 ` Joerg Roedel
2013-05-13 14:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-14 17:37 ` Joerg Roedel
2013-05-14 17:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87hai8kwgh.fsf@nemi.mork.no \
--to=bjorn@mork.no \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.mckenney@linaro.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox