From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756664Ab3A1JXo (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jan 2013 04:23:44 -0500 Received: from stringer.orebokech.com ([88.190.240.207]:54222 "EHLO stringer.orebokech.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755595Ab3A1JXe (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jan 2013 04:23:34 -0500 From: Romain Francoise To: David Miller Cc: mst@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] vhost-net: fall back to vmalloc if high-order allocation fails Organization: orebokech dot com References: <87k3r31vbc.fsf@silenus.orebokech.com> <20130123210411.GA9055@redhat.com> <20130127.221137.1761549497221263360.davem@davemloft.net> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 10:23:32 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20130127.221137.1761549497221263360.davem@davemloft.net> (David Miller's message of "Sun, 27 Jan 2013 22:11:37 -0500 (EST)") Message-ID: <87ham1u0dn.fsf@silenus.orebokech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org David Miller writes: > I'm not going to apply this vmalloc patch, because if I apply it the > fundamental problem here just gets swept under the carpet even longer. No problem, I'll keep this as a local change until vhost-net's allocation strategy gains some sanity. Thanks.