The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
To: Chuyi Zhou <zhouchuyi@bytedance.com>,
	mingo@redhat.com, luto@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	paulmck@kernel.org, muchun.song@linux.dev, bp@alien8.de,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	bigeasy@linutronix.de, clrkwllms@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	nadav.amit@gmail.com, vkuznets@redhat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chuyi Zhou <zhouchuyi@bytedance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 04/14] smp: Use task-local IPI cpumask in smp_call_function_many_cond()
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2026 01:17:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ik6qs82x.ffs@fw13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260630111008.2034376-5-zhouchuyi@bytedance.com>

On Tue, Jun 30 2026 at 19:09, Chuyi Zhou wrote:
> The memory cost is explicit: one word is added to task_struct. When
> cpumask_size() fits in that word, the mask is stored inline and no
> separate allocation is needed. Larger systems allocate cpumask_size() per
> task; on x86-64 NR_CPUS=8192 this is about 1 KiB per task. For context,

It's not about. It's one kilobyte, no?

> @@ -1364,6 +1364,12 @@ struct task_struct {
>  	struct list_head		perf_event_list;
>  	struct perf_ctx_data __rcu	*perf_ctx_data;
>  #endif
> +#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) && defined(CONFIG_PREEMPTION)
> +	union {
> +		cpumask_t			*ipi_mask_ptr;
> +		unsigned long			ipi_mask_val;
> +	};
> +#endif

Aside of this horrible ifdeffery, this construct makes me more than
nervous as it's too trivial to add code which deferences the pointer
directly. The proper thing to do is:

#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) && defined(CONFIG_PREEMPTION)
struct task_ipi_mask {
	union {
		cpumask_t			*ipi_mask_ptr;
		unsigned long			ipi_mask_val;
	};
};
#else
struct task_ipi_mask { };
#endif

struct task_struct {
	...
        struct task_ipi_mask			__private ipi_mask;

and have the magic accessors use

         ACCESS_PRIVATE(t->ipi_mask.member);

That allows static analysis to catch any incidential direct references.

Thanks,

        tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-07 23:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-30 11:09 [PATCH v9 00/14] Allow preemption during IPI completion waiting to improve real-time performance Chuyi Zhou
2026-06-30 11:09 ` [PATCH v9 01/14] smp: Disable preemption explicitly in __csd_lock_wait() Chuyi Zhou
2026-06-30 11:09 ` [PATCH v9 02/14] smp: Enable preemption early in smp_call_function_single() Chuyi Zhou
2026-06-30 11:09 ` [PATCH v9 03/14] smp: Refactor remote CPU selection in smp_call_function_any() Chuyi Zhou
2026-06-30 11:09 ` [PATCH v9 04/14] smp: Use task-local IPI cpumask in smp_call_function_many_cond() Chuyi Zhou
2026-07-07 23:17   ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2026-07-08  7:48     ` Chuyi Zhou
2026-06-30 11:09 ` [PATCH v9 05/14] smp: Alloc percpu csd data in smpcfd_prepare_cpu() only once Chuyi Zhou
2026-06-30 11:10 ` [PATCH v9 06/14] smp: Enable preemption early in smp_call_function_many_cond() Chuyi Zhou
2026-06-30 11:10 ` [PATCH v9 07/14] smp: Remove preempt_disable() from smp_call_function() Chuyi Zhou
2026-06-30 11:10 ` [PATCH v9 08/14] smp: Remove preempt_disable() from on_each_cpu_cond_mask() Chuyi Zhou
2026-06-30 11:10 ` [PATCH v9 09/14] scftorture: Remove preempt_disable() in scftorture_invoke_one() Chuyi Zhou
2026-06-30 11:10 ` [PATCH v9 10/14] x86/mm: Factor out flush_tlb_info initialization Chuyi Zhou
2026-06-30 11:10 ` [PATCH v9 11/14] x86/mm: Cap flush_tlb_info alignment at 64 bytes Chuyi Zhou
2026-06-30 11:10 ` [PATCH v9 12/14] x86/mm: Move flush_tlb_info back to the stack Chuyi Zhou
2026-06-30 11:10 ` [PATCH v9 13/14] x86/kvm: Disable preemption in kvm_flush_tlb_multi() Chuyi Zhou
2026-06-30 11:10 ` [PATCH v9 14/14] x86/mm: Re-enable preemption before flush_tlb_multi() Chuyi Zhou
2026-07-07 11:42 ` [PATCH v9 00/14] Allow preemption during IPI completion waiting to improve real-time performance Chuyi Zhou

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ik6qs82x.ffs@fw13 \
    --to=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=zhouchuyi@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox