From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A87133FE669 for ; Mon, 11 May 2026 14:38:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778510335; cv=none; b=SxNkGSYD1lDBQnNvem+hdI5Xvkhvpy9Wu33aN+aYDhw4E5h0tkfH4vBmUHIIb6Q9g5vsmCQtTuL2m/cXoqFyyf8Tk5TNWLEtroV8FyL07zjGDAf6DSQOT2P3y8mwCKdTs5J7Kj7SOOiWp2jjZSyoZX59s27uZiBQTPeX9zxE6II= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778510335; c=relaxed/simple; bh=BDZKqrdmcbClRwUMBhZ6Vke7BM3KWXWz1KmpWqnAbuA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=NKIEePYTbrqtxWNP2ZxyBPdM4avCRT1cu3MV1SmLwWB0e6k8aiDfllpmhGu2rcS/rk23dCMkMaapc2jFya5CBvZtW3vm4qAEm3qwPn04Vl7xFCqJ5bLO9tZY+AM/kds2x42XpqKwuSqAXnbAMiDxbMhtE2itLlQ57xWF2qpDhv8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Xg0bGY6K; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Xg0bGY6K" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F3838C2BCB0; Mon, 11 May 2026 14:38:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1778510335; bh=BDZKqrdmcbClRwUMBhZ6Vke7BM3KWXWz1KmpWqnAbuA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=Xg0bGY6KFa0n04GS3XF4EzKyIheqJ9zbBJx+uY0doBWl+livUGzW7BWtL7NbkWvbJ ovPwTDBW0BhDknZ8Zn0rUXUcc3/qcoJduiTU6eAXOofE6RizFoKsUPA0nTLVdrrc2b 2xOMKQ63pRfDE2wwgUbw7CrE4m61xjXg3UZdpKddbQwgWmdJ5pUKfVeP0+jDZ2Ohmi FJl/zM+v7E+XUzCwZPlt/rFpBj16zDhhseJMiKJ5AICF7W72LAPI9edczJxns0u7ql lUqJq7YJH0PLm4yH/nNq5s25BY90oqd1x1kXcXsdaK48Z3nstEofjwOi2GaDuxfacA X69lW8Ktdk0Tg== From: Thomas Gleixner To: Radu Rendec , LKML Cc: x86@kernel.org, Michael Kelley , Dmitry Ilvokhin , Jan Kiszka , Kieran Bingham , Florian Fainelli , Marc Zyngier Subject: Re: [patch V5 05/15] x86/irq: Suppress unlikely interrupt stats by default In-Reply-To: References: <20260401195625.213446764@kernel.org> <20260401201348.355938635@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 16:38:52 +0200 Message-ID: <87ik8u80zn.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Thu, Apr 02 2026 at 12:39, Radu Rendec wrote: >> - inc_irq_stat(SPURIOUS); >> + irq_stat_inc_and_enable(IRQ_COUNT_SPURIOUS); > > This is just a matter of style but for symmetry with inc_irq_stat(), I > would prepend '__' to the function name and create a wrapper macro that > adds the 'IRQ_COUNT_' prefix. > > And for consistency (you also have inc_perf_irq_stat()) I would call it > inc_and_enable_irq_stat(). I fundamentaly despise these constructs which do not have a proper name space prefix. They make it just hard to grep for. Yes, inc_irq_stat() exists already, but that does not mean we need to proliferate it. Thanks, tglx