Re: [PATCH v2 00/45] Consolidate hrtimer initialization - Part 4

[Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>]

Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> writes:

> On Thu, Feb 06 2025 at 11:56, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
>> Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de> writes:
>>
>>> hrtimers is initialized with hrtimer_init(), and after that the timer's
>>> callback function is setup separately. This separate initialization is
>>> error prone and awkward to use.
>>>
>>> hrtimer_setup() combines the initialization and is simpler to use.
>>>
>>> Switch to use the new setup function. Most conversions were done with
>>> Coccinelle, see the sematic patch below.
>>>
>>> This series is intended to be applied to the tip tree
>>>
>>> v1 -> v2 https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1729865485.git.namcao@linutronix.de
>>>   - rebase onto v6.14-rc1
>>
>> Link to v2 of part 1 is missing. It's also somehow not in my notmuch
>> datadase (looked for "hrtimers: Switch to new hrtimer interface
>> functions" -- took a guess based on v1) and is not googleable. It's kind
>> of important for reviewing this one. v1 did have the links to the other
>> parts, at least.
>
> It's archived and searchable on lore:
>
>   https://lore.kernel.org/all/?q=hrtimers%3A+Consolidate+hrtimer+initialization+-+Part+1
>
> and the third google result points to:
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20241031-hrtimer_setup_p1_v2-v2-0-23400656575a@linutronix.de/

In the only other version that I was CC'd on, Part 1's subject line was:
"hrtimers: Switch to new hrtimer interface functions", hence the
confusion.

> That part 1 series has been applied and is in mainline already.

Yes, I was grepping for the function that got removed. Low caffeine
level in the bloodstream or something.

But now that it's in mainline, I can pick up the patch intended for me
or just ack it. Any preferences?

Thanks,
--
Alex