From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Cc: "Dalmas, Marcelo (GE Vernova)" <marcelo.dalmas@ge.com>,
"jstultz@google.com" <jstultz@google.com>,
"sboyd@kernel.org" <sboyd@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ntp: fix bug in adjtimex reading time offset
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 11:54:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87iks7y6f4.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r06wy3sf.ffs@tglx>
On Wed, Nov 27 2024 at 18:39, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27 2024 at 18:35, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 27 2024 at 08:05, Richard Cochran wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 03:10:30PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> The patch was generated by the following coccinelle script:
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> So I guess combining random other manual fixes into a patch that
>>> claims to be generated is a bad idea?
>>
>> Indeed. I just figured out why the cast is there. txc::time_offset is of
>> type 'long long', so the division triggers a build fail on 32-bit.
>>
>> It want's to be:
>>
>> txc->time_offset = div_s64(txc->time_offset, NSEC_PER_USEC);
>
> Or simpler by using a (s32) cast instead, which is sufficient as
> time_offset must be in the range of [INT_MIN ... INT_MAX] because
> NTP_SCALE_SHIFT is 32.
But that requires a comment while div_s64() is self explaining and it
does not matter performance wise as the 32bit implementations reduce it
to a 32bit/32bit division.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-28 10:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-25 12:16 [PATCH] ntp: fix bug in adjtimex reading time offset Dalmas, Marcelo (GE Vernova)
2024-11-27 14:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-27 16:05 ` Richard Cochran
2024-11-27 17:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-27 17:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-28 10:54 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2024-11-27 17:33 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87iks7y6f4.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo.dalmas@ge.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox