The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
To: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
	 Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	 Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] setlocalversion: work around "git describe" performance
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2024 23:12:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87iksdk3ag.fsf@prevas.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK7LNAS6aU4L+4JyDXzncMVsY+6XRYTD=RkhcXSUXTRh_WxWWw@mail.gmail.com> (Masahiro Yamada's message of "Sat, 23 Nov 2024 17:06:50 +0900")

On Sat, Nov 23 2024, Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> wrote:

> On Sat, Nov 23, 2024 at 12:01 AM Rasmus Villemoes
> <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> wrote:

>> v4:
>>
>> - Switch the logic to make use of the return values from try_tag,
>>   instead of asking whether $count has been set.
>
>
> No, please do not do this.
>
> As I replied in v3, my plan is to set -e, because otherwise
> the shell script is fragile.
>
> With this version, -e will not work in try_tag()
> because it is used in the if condition.

I'm confused. Previously you said that "either style is fine with
me". Now you've invented some necessity to add "set -e", which of course
yes, is then suppressed inside try_tag. But there is not a single
statement within that that would cause "set -e" to exit anyway: The only
one that is not a simple assignment or is itself a test is the "set --
$()", and git rev-list failing there does not cause set -e to trigger.

Aside from that, I'm skeptical to introducing set -e anyway, it's simply
too hard to reason about what it will actually
do. http://mywiki.wooledge.org/BashFAQ/105 . But you're the maintainer.

>> +try_tag() {
>> +       tag="$1"
>> +
>> +       # Is $tag an annotated tag?
>> +       [ "$(git cat-file -t "$tag" 2> /dev/null)" = tag ] || return 1
>> +
>> +       # Is it an ancestor of HEAD, and if so, how many commits are in $tag..HEAD?
>> +       # shellcheck disable=SC2046 # word splitting is the point here
>> +       set -- $(git rev-list --count --left-right "$tag"...HEAD 2> /dev/null)
>> +
>> +       # $1 is 0 if and only if $tag is an ancestor of HEAD. Use
>> +       # string comparison, because $1 is empty if the 'git rev-list'
>> +       # command somehow failed.
>> +       [ "$1" = 0 ] || return 1
>> +
>> +       # $2 is the number of commits in the range $tag..HEAD, possibly 0.
>> +       count="$2"
>
> Redundant double-quotes.

Perhaps, but sorry, I'm not code-golfing, and trying to remember when
quotes can be elided when variables are referenced is simply not
something I spend my very limited brain capacity on.

Feel free to make any adjustments you want and commit that, or drop
this, I'm not sending a v5 as that seems to be a waste of everybody's
time.

Rasmus

  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-23 22:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-22 15:00 [PATCH v4] setlocalversion: work around "git describe" performance Rasmus Villemoes
2024-11-22 17:08 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2024-11-23  8:06 ` Masahiro Yamada
2024-11-23 22:12   ` Rasmus Villemoes [this message]
2024-11-24  2:10     ` Masahiro Yamada

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87iksdk3ag.fsf@prevas.dk \
    --to=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox