Re: [GIT PULL] Please pull powerpc/linux.git powerpc-6.1-4 tag

[Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>]

Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> writes:
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 7:09 PM Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> wrote:
>>
>>  - Fix an endian thinko in the asm-generic compat_arg_u64() which led to syscall arguments
>>    being swapped for some compat syscalls.
>
> Am I mis-reading this, or did this bug (introduced in this merge
> window by commit 43d5de2b67d7 "asm-generic: compat: Support BE for
> long long args in 32-bit ABIs") break *every* architecture?

No. Just RISC-V and powerpc.

> And people just didn't scream, because 32-bit code has just become so rare?

I had two systems and several VMs that booted happily with the bug
present, so there's some luck involved as to whether your userspace
trips over the bug in a way that matters.

But we did have people scream eventually :/

> Or is it just because those compat macros are effectively not used
> elsewhere, and x86 has its own versions? Looks like possibly mainly
> RISC-V?

Yeah. Although compat_arg_u64() is defined for all arches, it's only
used in places guarded by __ARCH_WANT_COMPAT_FOO macros, and those are
only selected by RISC-V and powerpc.

Full list is:

  __ARCH_WANT_COMPAT_FADVISE64_64       riscv
  __ARCH_WANT_COMPAT_FALLOCATE          riscv, powerpc
  __ARCH_WANT_COMPAT_FTRUNCATE64        riscv
  __ARCH_WANT_COMPAT_PREAD64            riscv
  __ARCH_WANT_COMPAT_PWRITE64           riscv
  __ARCH_WANT_COMPAT_READAHEAD          riscv
  __ARCH_WANT_COMPAT_SYNC_FILE_RANGE    riscv
  __ARCH_WANT_COMPAT_TRUNCATE64         riscv


> Side note: why is it doing
>
>         #ifndef compat_arg_u64
>
> at all? That macro is not actually defined anywhere else, so that
> #ifdef seems to be just confused.

That goes back to the original submission:

  59c10c52f573 ("riscv: compat: syscall: Add compat_sys_call_table implementation")

I guess it was following the example in asm-generic/compat.h where a
bunch of other things are guarded by ifndefs. But agree it's
unnecessarily flexible in this case until we have another definition.

cheers